Sereno: Tijam has prejudged quo warranto petition against me | Inquirer News
Close  

Sereno: Tijam has prejudged quo warranto petition against me

/ 05:44 PM June 02, 2018
sereno

Former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno (File photo by RICHARD A. REYES / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

Former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno said that Associate Justice Noel Tijam showed his prejudices in the quo warranto petition against her, which the Supreme Court granted, voting 8-6.

Sereno also questioned Tijam’s handling of the petition as member-in-charge, claiming that he had already made prejudgments against her.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a statement issued on Saturday, Sereno noted that the footnotes of Tijam’s 153-page ponencia showed that the decision was already being drafted on March 15, four days before she submitted her comments on the petition.

“These show that Respondent never had a chance from the start. Justice Tijam had condemned Respondent before he heard her,” Sereno said in a statement on Saturday.

FEATURED STORIES

Sereno also mentioned a phone call by Tijam to the Judicial and Bar Council to inquire about Sereno’s case. But it was not used as an official evidence in the hearings. According to her, judges deciding on a case should not seek evidence — they should merely decide based on the evidence submitted.

“That the ponente made or caused such a call to be made is not allowed and shows prejudice,” Sereno said.

“If a judge who suggested to a party what evidence it should present was held to have ‘transgressed the boundaries of impartiality,’ with all the more reason should a Justice who motu proprio looked for and considered evidence which neither party submitted be held to have transgressed such bounds,” she added.

Sereno had urged that Tijam inhibit himself from the case. She also had same request for Associate Justices Teresita Leonardo de Castro, Diosdado Peralta, Lucas Bersamin, Francis Jardeleza, and Samuel Martires.

Sereno said the six justices had already shown their prejudices when they testified against her at the impeachment hearings of the House of Representatives.

All six also voted in favor of the quo warranto petition filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida for discrepancies on Sereno’s statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth (SALN). /atm

READ: Peers kick Sereno out via Calida’s QW

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Jose Calida, Maria Lourdes Sereno, quo warranto petition, Sereno impeachment Noel Tijam, Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.