Palace supports DOJ decision to terminate witness protection for Napoles | Inquirer News

Palace supports DOJ decision to terminate witness protection for Napoles

By: - Reporter / @JhoannaBINQ
/ 07:33 PM May 25, 2018

Malacañang welcomed on Friday the decision of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to terminate the Witness Protection Program (WPP) coverage for alleged pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.

Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said they agree with Justice Sec. Menardo Guevarra’s decision to remove Napoles in the WPP, believing she is not the least guilty of those involved in the P10-billion corruption scandal.

“We support DOJ secretary decision and agree that [Napoles] is not least guilty whose testimony is not indispensible and can be testified upon by other witnesses,” Roque said in a text message to reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: DOJ: Napoles no longer under WPP

FEATURED STORIES

Guevarra on Friday said he had issued a letter to Napoles “giving notice of the termination of her provisional coverage” in the WPP, noting there were no more threats to her life that warrant her admission to the program.

“The main purpose for which Ms. Napoles had sought admission into the WPSBP [Witness Protection Security and Benefit Program] has become moot and academic. As there has been no further claim of threats to her personal security inside Camp Bagong Diwa, [we] found no reason to extend further Ms. Napoles’ provisional coverage under the WPP,” Guevarra said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Napoles was provisionally admitted to the program under then-Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II after executing an affidavit that implicated more names in the multi-billion peso Priority Development Assistance Fund scam.  /vvp

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.