SC: No constitutional crisis despite CJ ouster without impeachment trial | Inquirer News

SC: No constitutional crisis despite CJ ouster without impeachment trial

/ 06:29 PM May 12, 2018

The Supreme Court dismissed warnings that a constitutional crisis could arise if it would allow the removal of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno without an impeachment trial.

In its 153-page decision that disqualified Sereno from holding the top magistrate position, the SC said there could not be a constitutional crisis considering that Constitution itself had given them the authority to resolve quo warranto cases.

“The Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over an action for quo warranto falls within the ambit of its judicial power to settle justiciable issues or actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable,” the high court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Resolving quo warranto cases is among the powers of the Supreme Court stated under Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution.

FEATURED STORIES

A quo warranto petition once granted allows the removal an unqualified official from his or her post.

Solicitor General Jose Calida filed the quo warranto petition against Sereno for her failure to submit a complete copy of her statement of assets, liabilities and networth (SALN) when she applied for the chief justice post in 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

The SC said an outright dismissal of the petition would be “a clear abdication of their duty.”

“The easiest way to lose power is to abdicate it,” the SC said. /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.