Drilon: Separation of powers blocks Senate from acting on Sereno ouster | Inquirer News

Drilon: Separation of powers blocks Senate from acting on Sereno ouster

/ 02:31 PM May 12, 2018

After criticisms were hurled at the Senate for its alleged inaction on former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno’s ouster, Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon said the separation of powers between the legislative and judiciary prevents solons from interfering.

“Papaano po namin ipaglalaban ‘yon (impeachment proceedings), dahilan sa ‘yong kaso ay nasa Supreme Court, may separation of powers kami,” Drilon said in an interview with DWIZ on Saturday.

Drilon reacted to comments raised by some groups that the Senate could have filed a resolution to block the Supreme Court from deciding on the quo warranto petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Unang-una, wala kaming session, papaano kami magpa-file ng resolution?  Pangalawa, ‘yan ay resolution lamang, at nagpasya ang Korte Suprema that they would take jurisdiction.  Magkakaroon ng krisis kung ipipilit,” Drilon said.

FEATURED STORIES

“‘Yan ay resolution lang, ‘hindi naman po namin pwedeng i-pilit ang Korte Suprema na galangin ang impeachment power ng Senado,” he added.

According to Drilon, even if such a resolution was filed, it would have no sense at all because only senators belonging to the minority might sign it.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We can express our sense of the Senate, kami po sa minorya, the six of us, ang amin pong posisyon ay dapat, ang tamang paraan ay sa Senado through an impeachment court. Ngunit anim lang kami, at ‘yong pagpasa ng resolution ay kailangan ‘yong mayorya,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Sereno was ousted from office on Friday, after the Supreme Court (SC) justices en banc voted 8-6 in favor of the quo warranto petition filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida.

Article continues after this advertisement

Several law professors and deans of law schools have earlier stressed that Sereno could only be removed from office by way of an impeachment trial as the 1987 Constitution only allows the removal of a sitting chief justice through impeachment.

 

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Peers kick Sereno out via Calida’s QW

READ: Impeachment only way to oust CJ, say law deans

Drilon also added that Senate also cannot act on the impeachment proceedings if the House of Representatives would not endorse any complaint.

“Ang impeachment complaint po ay manggagaling sa House of Representatives, kung wala pong complaint na na-file sa amin, ano po ang gagawin ng Senado?” Drilon said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Kailangang i-file ‘yong complaint sa Senado so that we can acquire jurisdiction.  Ngayon, eh kung walang na-file sa amin, walang inakyat na impeachment complaint, ano po ang aming tatalakayin?” /muf

TAGS: Senate, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.