Pimentel: SC should review Sereno ouster decision | Inquirer News

Pimentel: SC should review Sereno ouster decision

/ 04:33 PM May 11, 2018

The Supreme Court (SC) should review its decision to oust Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and give her the opportunity to file a motion for reconsideration (MR), Senate President Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III said on Friday as he rallied everyone to “uphold the rule of law.”

“Let us all uphold the RULE OF LAW. The people must be given time to review this decision. And the Supreme Court itself must also take the time to review its own decision. If the Supreme Court is not supreme in everything then it is also not infallible in everything,” Pimentel said in a statement.

“The respondent Chief Justice must be given the opportunity to file a Motion for Reconsideration. God bless our beloved country,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pimentel, a staunch ally of the Duterte administration, issued the remark hours after the High Court, voting 8-6, granted the quo warranto petition that sought to remove Sereno from office.

FEATURED STORIES

The petition was filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida – the principal lawyer of the government – who questioned the qualification of Sereno as the country’s top magistrate.

READ: Justices remove Sereno from SC

Article continues after this advertisement


With the decision of the magistrates against Sereno, the Senate leader reminded that the SC is not supreme in everything, as he underscored that the chief justice can only be removed after an impeachment by Congress.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Supreme Court is supreme in a lot of things but not in everything. In impeachment matters the Supreme Court is not supreme, because the Senate is the one and only impeachment court,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Chief Justice is an impeachable official who can be removed only after impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate,” he added.

“The reputation and esteem of this present Supreme Court will now rise or fall on the basis of the soundness or unsoundness of this controversial decision upholding a very unusual remedy to oust a sitting Chief Justice,” he continued.    /muf

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Ouster, Pimentel, quo warranto, Sereno

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.