CA ruling voids Binay’s political ban | Inquirer News

CA ruling voids Binay’s political ban

Court cites Aguinaldo doctrine, says ex-Makati mayor’s reelection in 2013 a condonation of his administrative liabilities
By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 05:05 AM May 08, 2018

Junjun Binay —INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The Court of Appeals may have just cleared the way for former Makati City Mayor Jejomar Erwin “Junjun” Binay’s return to politics after it voided the Ombudsman’s order which permanently banned him from government service over alleged irregularities in the construction of the P2.3-billion Makati City Hall Building II.

In its May 3 ruling, the appellate court’s 10th Division said the so-called “Aguinaldo doctrine,” which absolves elected officials of administrative liabilities after their reelection, was still “applicable” to Binay’s case even after the Supreme Court abandoned it in 2015.

Article continues after this advertisement

Landmark SC decision

FEATURED STORIES

In that landmark decision which stemmed from the Ombudsman’s earlier order suspending Binay from office for six months, the high tribunal ruled that the condonation doctrine had no legal basis under the 1987 Constitution.

However, the Supreme Court said the cancellation of the principle should be applied prospectively, which means that all elected officials charged for administrative offenses prior to the promulgation of its decision on Nov. 10, 2015, may still invoke the condonation doctrine.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Indubitably, this court cannot sustain the (Ombudsman) with respect to Binay without utterly disregarding the foregoing pronouncements of the Supreme Court,” read a portion of the appellate court’s resolution which was released on Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

Still applicable

Article continues after this advertisement

“Considering that the present case was instituted prior to the ruling of the Supreme Court… the condonation doctrine may still be applied,” it said.

In addition, the appellate court said Binay was correct when he argued that while he signed the two disbursement vouchers for the construction project after his reelection, the project had been approved during his first term.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Given the factual circumstances herein and the prevailing jurisprudence, this court holds that the undisputed and subsequent reelection of Binay in the year 2013 is a condonation of his administrative liabilities,” the court stressed.

The decision was penned by Associate Justice Edwin Sorongon and was concurred in by Associate Justices Sesinando Villon and Maria Filomena Singh.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Besides absolving Binay, the appellate court also ordered the reinstatement of Makati city hall employees Emerito Magat, Nelia Barlis, Leonila Querijero, Raydes Pestano, Eleno Mendoza and Virginia Hernandez.

TAGS: Court of Appeals, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.