Senate as impeachment court can decide on Sereno quo warranto case | Inquirer News
IF SC HAS NOT DECIDED

Senate as impeachment court can decide on Sereno quo warranto case

/ 09:28 PM April 25, 2018

Aquilino Pimentel III

Senate President Aquilino Pimentel III. (File photo from the Philippine Daily Inquirer)

Senate President Aquilino Pimentel III on Wednesday said that the Senate would prevail over the Supreme Court if the legislative body could convene as an impeachment court before any decision could be made on the quo warranto case against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.

But Pimentel explained that the Senate would be “like any court in the sense that it is passive.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“If anything happens before we are convened as a court, we will have no say,” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

On the other hand, should the Senate impeachment proceedings come first, Pimentel said, the senators, as judges, would have to vote whether or not to uphold Supreme Court decision.

This means if the decision on the quo warranto case, which Solicitor General Jose Calida filed against Sereno, would be released before the House of Representatives could transmit the articles of impeachment, the Senate does not need to convene as a court anymore.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Once we become a court, the question would be: Would the Senate recognize the removal of the Chief Justice through a quo warranto? If the majority says it is a valid removal, then there is no need to remove [through impeachment],” he said.

“If we believe that it is invalid [and] from our point of view, there is still someone to remove, then we would continue with the impeachment,” he added. /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Senate, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.