Claims of irregularities on wet ballots found by Marcos camp disputed | Inquirer News

Claims of irregularities on wet ballots found by Marcos camp disputed

/ 07:59 PM April 05, 2018

vote recount

REVISION HALL A former gym on the fifth floor of the Supreme Court-Court of Appeals building on Padre Faura Street in Manila will be the venue of the manual recount of votes in the 2016 vice presidential election. —MARIANNE BERMUDEZ

The lawyer of Vice President Leni Robredo on Thursday disputed what the camp of former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos claimed were irregularities in several ballot boxes as the recount of votes in the 2016 vice presidential elections continued.

Atty. Romulo Macalintal said the Marcos camp also has not presented any evidence to prove the massive irregularities they said they had found.

Article continues after this advertisement

In an interview at the start of the recount on Monday, Marcos told reporters that all the ballots in four precincts in Bato, Camarines Sur, were soaked in water when they were opened.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Bongbong cites ‘irregularities’ in ballot boxes with vote recount under way

Camarines Sur is one of three provinces covered by the recount. The other two are Iloilo and Negros Oriental.

Article continues after this advertisement

Marcos said it was impossible for the ballots to have been wet for the last two years. He added that out of 42 precincts in Bato, 38 have missing audit logs.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the audit log would show the time when the precinct opened, the time the vote was cast, and the time the precinct closed. It would also show if there was batch voting and if someone voted beyond the voting hours, he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Wednesday, Marcos’ spokesman Atty. Vic Rodriguez also quoted sources claiming that there were ballots pre-shaded for Robredo.

But Macalintal maintained that wet ballots, unused ballots, and missing audit logs are not evidence of irregularity in an election.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The evidence of irregularity in an election is that there would be a radical difference between the physical count of the ballots and results of the ballots as reflected on the returns and the number of votes as they were proclaimed,” he said.

The recount started on April 2 and may take months before it is completed.

According to the Presidential Electoral Tribunal, the results of the recount for the three provinces will determine whether there is cause to reopen and manually recount the remaining 31,047 precincts in Marcos’ protest.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Robredo garnered 14,418,817 votes in the vice presidential race, or 263,473 more than Marcos who got 14,155,344 votes. /jpv/au

TAGS: Macalintal, Marcos, Pet, poll protest, robredo

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.