Dapecol roads are not for public use, superintendent insists | Inquirer News
HOUSE HEARING ON BUCOR-TADECO DEAL

Dapecol roads are not for public use, superintendent insists

/ 09:48 PM March 21, 2018

Tagum Agricultural Development Co. (Tadeco) maintains that the farm roads under the Davao Penal Colony (Dapecol) are not for public use.

During the House hearing conducted on Tuesday, House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez questioned Gerardo Padilla, acting superintendent of Dapecol, about the illegal road closure within the sprawling banana plantation.

Alvarez asked Padilla if the roads were public or private. Padila said the roads were considered government property.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Public. Ggobyerno ang may-ari hindi ba? So bakit mo isinara?” asked Alvarez.

FEATURED STORIES

Padilla explained that the roads were closed by virtue of a memorandum between the local agriculture office and the provincial government.

READ: BuCor exec assures reopening of roads closed by Tadeco deal

But lawyer Nicolas Bañga of Tadeco said in a statement tjat “the farm roads under Dapecol are not for public use but for a specific government purpose.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Bañga reiterated that the agreement was above-board.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said it had been “contributing significantly to national economic and social developments by providing jobs and religiously paying taxes to the government.”

He added that such “futile exercise [by Congress] is nothing but harassment.” /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.