Sen. Pimentel backs De Lima, justices | Inquirer News

Sen. Pimentel backs De Lima, justices

/ 03:57 AM November 21, 2011

Senator Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III. INQUIRER file photo

Senator Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III on Sunday threw his support behind Justice Secretary Leila de Lima in the government’s effort to prosecute former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo for plunder and electoral sabotage.

“I unequivocally support Secretary De Lima, for she prevented Arroyo from leaving for abroad and escaping prosecution. She should be commended instead of reproached for upholding justice and the rule of law,” Pimentel said.

Article continues after this advertisement

It was Pimentel who actually instigated the electoral sabotage raps against Arroyo after he protested his election loss in 2007. Witnesses came forward to accuse the former president and others of allegedly ordering the cheating.

FEATURED STORIES

Pimentel also cited Associate Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno for her dissenting opinion on the temporary restraining order (TRO) the Supreme Court issued on the watch list order against Arroyo.

Sereno argued that the November 15 TRO remained ineffective because the Arroyo couple had failed to comply with Condition No. 2—“petitioners shall appoint a legal representative common to both of them who will receive subpoena, orders and other legal processes on their behalf during their absence.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Pimentel said, “With all due respect to the Supreme Court, I believe it should desist from citing Secretary De Lima for contempt for allegedly ignoring the TRO they issued against the enforcement of the watch list order on Arroyo.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator said that “to have allowed Arroyo to  leave for abroad would have been tantamount to abdicating Secretary De Lima’s duty to uphold the rule of law.”

Pimentel also praised Associate Justice Antonio Carpio who also expressed a dissenting opinion. Carpio emphasized that “while the right to travel is a constitutional right that may be impaired only  as may be provided by law, there are recognized exceptions. Foremost is the restriction on the right to travel of persons charged with crimes before the courts.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Crime, Government, Judiciary, Justice, law, Leila de Lima, Politics, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.