Lack of TRO on Revilla trial blamed on Sereno issues | Inquirer News

Lack of TRO on Revilla trial blamed on Sereno issues

/ 07:38 AM March 08, 2018

Former Solicitor General Estelito Mendoza has blamed Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno for the Supreme Court’s lack of action on former Sen. Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr.’s plea to stop his plunder trial.

Mendoza asked the Sandiganbayan First Division on Tuesday to cancel more hearings in the plunder trial as he held out hope that the Supreme Court would soon issue the temporary restraining order (TRO) that Revilla had been requesting since January.

“I don’t think (Revilla) should be penalized on a problem not of his own making, nonetheless that of the Chief Justice,” said Revilla’s counsel.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The postponement is not for casual reasons, it is for us and the SC to look into the issues substantial to the right to due process. This is the first time the Supreme Court is in a state of paralysis. Everybody is preoccupied with the Chief Justice,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

Cancelled hearings

Revilla was supposed to have presented evidence in his defense on Feb. 15, 20, 22 and 27, as well as March 6, 8, 13 and 15. All of these hearings were cancelled without him having begun his defense.

In a seven-page motion dated March 2, Revilla also admitted to the Sandiganbayan that he had not prepared evidence in his defense, because doing so would contradict his Supreme Court petition.

The SC petition, which sought the interim measures of suspending the hearings and releasing him from detention, was hinged on the issue of the Sandiganbayan’s December denial of his motion for leave to file a demurrer.

The demurrer questions the sufficiency of the Ombudsman’s evidence. —VINCE F. NONATO

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Bong Revilla, Estelito Mendoza, PDAF, plunder case

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.