WHAT WENT BEFORE: Mental incapacity as ground for dismissal | Inquirer News

WHAT WENT BEFORE: Mental incapacity as ground for dismissal

/ 07:08 AM March 01, 2018

Mental incapacity can be a ground for dismissal from office if proven but, according to the Supreme Court, a declaration of mental disorder does not automatically translate into a judgment of mental incapacity to perform work as in the case of Metro Cebu Water District (MCWD) employee Vilma E. Romagos, who worked at the agency as clerk-processor.

In December 1999, the MCWD informed Romagos that she would be dropped from the rolls for mental incapacity effective Jan. 1, 2000.

On Aug. 9, 1999, the MCWD barred Romagos from entering the office unless she underwent  psychiatric treatment and was certified by her doctor to be mentally fit to work.

Article continues after this advertisement

Aside from  irregular attendance, several incident reports between January and August 1999 detailed how Romagos suddenly and without provocation began rambling loudly and incoherently, causing alarm and anxiety among employees and visitors.

FEATURED STORIES

A 1989 certification issued by Dr. Augustus B. Costas and a 1991 certification issued by Dr. Renato D. Obra said Romagos was under treatment for major depression.

On Aug. 20, 1999, a medical certification issued by Obra declared Romagos physically and mentally fit to go back to work.

Article continues after this advertisement

Romagos appealed her dismissal to the CSC Regional Office (CSCRO), questioning the procedure and factual basis of her removal from her job.

Article continues after this advertisement

The CSCRO dismissed her appeal in June 2000. Romagos filed a motion for reconsideration but the Court of Appeals denied the motion on Oct. 29, 2002.

Article continues after this advertisement

In 2007, the Supreme Court, in a decision written by Associate Justice Ma. Alicia Austria-Martinez, reversed and set aside the resolution of the Court of Appeals.

The Supreme Court declared illegal the dismissal of  Romagos and ordered the MCWD to reinstate her and pay her back wages.

Article continues after this advertisement

Source: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2007/september2007/156100.htm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.