Solon tells Deputy Ombudsman Carandang: Don’t defy Duterte, go to SC | Inquirer News

Solon tells Deputy Ombudsman Carandang: Don’t defy Duterte, go to SC

/ 06:59 PM February 04, 2018

Vicente Veloso

Leyte Rep. Vicente Veloso (File photo by RICHARD A. REYES / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

Overall Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur Carandang should go to the Supreme Court instead of defying the suspension order issued on him by Malacañang Palace, according to Leyte Rep. Vicente Veloso, a former associate justice of the Court of Appeals.

Echoing the Palace’s stance, Veloso said the Supreme Court’s January 2014 ruling that invalidated the president’s disciplinary powers over high-ranking officials of the Office of the Ombudsman could still be reversed.

Article continues after this advertisement

In that ruling,t he SC declared Section 8 of the Ombudsman Act unconstitutional for infringing on the government watchdog’s independence.

FEATURED STORIES

In an interview with radio station dzBB on Sunday, Veloso justified the Palace’s disregard for the SC ruling, noting that it was reached by way of a split vote of 9-6.

“[The jurisprudence] can change,” Veloso said. “So, if Carandang is adversely affected, he should go up to the Supreme Court. It’s not the Office of the President that will go there to seek declaratory relief because… the one with the cause of action as of now… is Carandang.”

Article continues after this advertisement
Melchor Arthur H. Carandang

Overall Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur H. Carandang (File photo by LYN RILLON / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

“It’s not unusual for the Supreme Court to get it wrong,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Veloso insisted that as appointees of the President, “the right to appoint carries with it the right to dismiss” even in the case of high-ranking Ombudsman officials.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The law should be followed. No ifs, no buts. Whatever the law says, we should follow,” he said, continuing to invoke the unconstitutional Ombudsman Act provision.

Veloso played down the constitutional crisis unfolding between the executive and the Office of the Ombudsman, an indenpendent constitutional body.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Veloso, “the law is well-defined” and the refusal of Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales to enforce the suspension order is a “criminal offense.”

He again floated his proposal for the abolition of the Office of the Ombudsman, saying that Department of Justice, a part of the executive branch of government, could handle the task on its own.

“The Office of the Ombudsman has become an office for persecution,” Veloso insisted.

President Rodrigo Duterte has been at loggerheads with Morales since Carandang disclosed details of the office’s investigation on his alleged hidden wealth.

This prompted Morales to shy away from the public eye for four months, until Carandang’s suspension forced her to denounce the Palace’s “patently unconstitutional” moves.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Morales is an aunt of Manases Carpio, husband of Davao City Mayor Sara Duterte-Carpio, a daugher of the president. /atm

TAGS: Conchita Carpio-Morales

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.