Suspension order will curtail Ombudsman’s power – De Lima | Inquirer News
DUTERTE WEALTH PROBE

Suspension order will curtail Ombudsman’s power – De Lima

By: - Reporter / @mj_uyINQ
/ 07:02 AM February 01, 2018

Allowing Malacañang to suspend Overall Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur Carandang will curtail the of the Ombudsman as the only public official authorized by law to investigate the President, detained opposition Sen. Leila de Lima warned the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

The Palace issued a preventive suspension order against Carandang on Monday for releasing documents related to Mr. Duterte’s bank accounts.

Carandang has started investigating the President’s and his family’s alleged unexplained wealth based on a complaint filed by Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV.

Article continues after this advertisement

He had said the Office of the Ombudsman received bank transaction records on the Dutertes’ supposed bank accounts from the Anti-Money Laundering Council. But the AMLC denied that it had issued a report on the bank accounts of the family.

FEATURED STORIES

De Lima said the suspension order indicated that Carandang was “hot on President Duterte’s money trail” and that Malacañang had to stop him before he uncovered the truth.

Supreme Court 2014 ruling

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is all about protecting the President and hiding his corruption. Malacañang has no qualms defying the court’s 2014 ruling to do this,” said the senator, one of Mr. Duterte’s fiercest critics who is now detained on drug charges based on testimonies of drug convicts.

Article continues after this advertisement

De Lima cited a high court ruling three years ago that reversed a 2012 decision affirming the President’s disciplinary powers over the Deputy Ombudsman.

Article continues after this advertisement

Unconstitutional

In reversing its 2012 decision on the case of Gonzales v. Office of the President, the high court said that granting the President disciplinary authority over the official violated the independence of the antigraft body and was therefore unconstitutional.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Malacañang’s action in suspending Carandang for investigating the President is the most illustrative lesson on why the 2014 court decision is correct,” De Lima said.

“Giving the President disciplinary authority over the person empowered to investigate him engenders conflict of interest scenarios,” she added.

On Tuesday, opposition senators Bam Aquino, Risa Hontiveros and Francis Pangilinan issued a joint statement questioning Malacañang’s suspension order.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

They said the order could be an attempt to stop Carandang from further disclosing the truth.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.