SC dismisses admin case vs Justice De Castro | Inquirer News

SC dismisses admin case vs Justice De Castro

/ 05:03 PM January 30, 2018

NOVEMBER 29, 2017 House of Representatives hearing on the impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno: Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo De Castro talks on the alleged falsification of a resolution reviving RCAO in Region 7. INQUIRER PHOTO/LYN RILLON

NOVEMBER 29, 2017
House of Representatives hearing on the impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno: Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo De Castro talks on the alleged falsification of a resolution reviving RCAO in Region 7.
INQUIRER PHOTO/LYN RILLON

The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday dismissed the administrative complaint against Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo De Castro who had been accused of violating the New Code of Conduct for the Philippine Judiciary for leaking confidential documents in aid of the impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno.

A source said the justices unanimously voted to dismiss the complaint filed last November by Filipino Alliance for Transparency and Empowerment (FATE), a newly formed group reportedly advocating good governance that has been supporting Sereno.

Article continues after this advertisement

The source said the high court justices saw no basis to the complaint filed by the group.

FEATURED STORIES

Both De Castro and Sereno did not participate in the deliberation. /je

READ: Group asks SC to probe Associate Justice De Castro for ‘leaked’ documents

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Sereno, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.