Lacson files con-ass resolution in Senate | Inquirer News

Lacson files con-ass resolution in Senate

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 11:19 AM January 15, 2018

Sen. Panfilo Lacson

As earlier announced, Senator Panfilo Lacson has filed a resolution calling on the Senate to compose itself as a constituent assembly (con-ass) to propose amendments to the 1987 Constitution upon approval of three-fourths of its members.

In Senate Resolution No. 580 that he posted in his Twitter account on Monday, Lacson pointed out the three modes on how an amendment to or revision of the Constitution must be done.

Article continues after this advertisement

The first mode could be through Congress upon a three-fourth votes of all its members, second is through a constitutional convention (con-con), and third, through the so-called “people’s initiative.”

FEATURED STORIES

“The framers of the fundamental law are silent on how Congress should meet in effecting this change in the Constitution,” said the measure.

In his proposal, Lacson seeks a Senate sitting as a constituent assembly separate from the House of Representatives.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said this would prevent the Senate from becoming irrelevant should the House insist on a con-ass with both chambers to amend the 1987 Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

Read more: ‘Con-ass without House’

Article continues after this advertisement

Lacson, in the resolution, noted the opinion of constitutionalist, Father Joaquin Bernas, about the “growing acceptance” that Congress, when acting as con-ass, “need not be in joint session but may act the way it does in ordinary legislation (because the Constitution does not require a joint session).”

The measure also cited retired-justice Adolfo Azcuna’s opinion that there was no general provision, which states that Congress when tackling legislation, must meet in joint session.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is none. When it comes to amendment, it doesn’t say you have to meet in joint session,” the resolution quoted Azcuna as saying.

In filing the resolution, Lacson noted that the “current maelstrom generated by the differing opinions on how this amendment to or revision of the Constitution should take place and the ambivalent political positioning of those favoring one or the other mode of effecting such change has caused bitter political bickering between and among our current political leaders in both houses of Congress.”

On Wednesday, the Senate committee on constitutional amendments and revision of codes chaired by Senator Francis Pangilinan is set to resume its deliberations on the proposed Charter change (Cha-cha) initiative.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Some congressmen, including Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, believe that the two chambers of Congress — the Senate and the House of Representatives — should vote jointly on Cha-cha. /cbb

TAGS: Constitutional Assembly, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.