Roque: CA ruling a travesty of justice | Inquirer News

Roque: CA ruling a travesty of justice

/ 07:27 AM January 09, 2018

Presidential Spokesperson Atty. Harry Roque. YANCY LIM/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO

Calling it a travesty of justice, a Malacañang official on Monday said the Duterte administration would “exercise all legal options” to overturn the Court of Appeals ruling that saved former Palawan Gov. Joel Reyes from standing trial for the 2011 murder of environmentalist and broadcaster Gerry Ortega.

Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said he would meet this week with Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II and Solicitor General Jose Calida to tackle the Ortega murder case and other high-profile cases.


“We will exercise all legal options to reverse this decision of the Court of Appeals… That’s an official stand of the Philippine government,” Roque said in a media briefing.

“The government will exhaust all remedies, including filing first a motion for reconsideration,” he added.


It’s up to the OSG

At the Department of Justice, Aguirre said it was up to the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) to appeal the ruling.

“It is the OSG that is in charge of the case since it is on appeal,” Aguirre said.

“The filing of an appeal depends on the ruling if it will constitute double jeopardy,” he added.

In a 3-2 decision on Jan. 4, a five-member special division of the appeals court exonerated Reyes, the alleged brains behind the murder of Ortega.

The special division ruled that the Puerto Princesa Regional Trial Court (RTC) abused its discretion when it decided there was probable cause to charge the former governor of involvement in the killing of the broadcaster.

“Call it a second chance afforded him by God or a lucky three-point play for him, to use a common street lingo, or a miracle in his favor, [Reyes] must by all means be exonerated from the charge,” Associate Justice Normandie Pizarro, writing for the majority, said in the ruling.


Associate Justices Danton Bueser and Victoria Paredes concurred with Pizarro’s opinion, while Associate Justices Maria Filomena Singh and Marie Christine Azcarraga-Jacob dissented.

Roque described the ruling as “alarming” and a “travesty of justice.”

The presidential spokesperson once served as a private prosecutor on the case until June 2016, when he joined the House of Representatives as a party-list nominee.

It’s a ‘mystery’

“For the first time, I was allowed by the President to comment in my individual capacity [on] this case … It is not true that the case was a ‘miracle,’ [as described by Pizarro]. The case, true, is a [mystery] that is really a travesty of justice,” he said.

He said there was a prior Supreme Court decision on the case that said it was “up to the Regional Trial Court to determine the existence of probable cause, which had been already determined by the Regional Trial Court.”

“So, I find it alarming that this [appeals court] decision overruled an earlier [Supreme Court] decision and arrogated its own judgment for that of the Regional Trial Court, [which] had [the] opportunity to physically accept the evidence, observe the demeanor of the witnesses, and concluded that there was probable cause,” Roque said.

Extrajudicial killing

“We had concluded the presentation of all evidence for the prosecution and the defense had also concluded its presentation of evidence and there was already a decision of the lower court that evidence of guilt was strong against former Gov. Joel Reyes,” he added.

Roque noted that Ortega’s murder fit the government’s official definition of an extrajudicial killing.

“This is a very sad development for freedom of the press in this country given that the murder of Gerry Ortega is a classic case of extralegal killing since Gerry Ortega was both a member of the journalism profession and he’s also an activist,” the Palace official said.

Ortega was shot dead by a hired gunman on Jan. 24, 2011, and Reyes had been pinpointed as the mastermind.

The investigation led to the indictment of Reyes, his younger brother, former Coron, Palawan, Mayor Mario Reyes, and several people formerly connected with the provincial government of Palawan.


Reyes was initially absolved by a justice department panel of investigators, but then Justice Secretary Leila de Lima rejected the decision and formed a second panel, which found prima facie evidence to indict him.

In 2012, the Reyeses went into hiding before the Palawan Regional Trial Court could issue warrants for their arrest.

Joel Reyes questioned before the appeals court the validity of the creation of a second panel and asked the tribunal to dismiss the case on that basis.

The case went through the courts while the Reyeses were in hiding. They were eventually arrested in Thailand and brought back to the Philippines to face trial in 2015.

Mario Reyes, however, was allowed to post bail in 2016. On Friday, Joel Reyes was released from jail after the appeals court handed down its ruling.

Roque said Joel Reyes should be placed on the Bureau of Immigration’s watch list to prevent him from escaping again. —WITH A REPORT FROM MARLON RAMOS

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Court of Appeals, Gerardo Ortega, Harry Roque, mario joel t. reyes, Vitaliano Aguirre jr
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

News that matters

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.