Recto wants PH to demand refund for ‘faulty’ Dengvaxia | Inquirer News

Recto wants PH to demand refund for ‘faulty’ Dengvaxia

By: - Reporter / @JLeonenINQ
/ 07:25 PM December 05, 2017

The Philippine government has the power to demand a P3.5 billion refund from Sanofi Pasteur for its “ineffective dengue vaccines,” Senate President Pro Tempore Ralph Recto said on Tuesday.

In a statement, Recto said that as per Republic Act 9184, or the Procurement Law, the government is compelled to demand a refund from the controversial pharmaceutical firm for the anti-dengue vaccine Dengvaxia.

“Kaya ito ang reseta natin sa Sanofi: Isauli ninyo ang bayad,” Recto said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(This is our prescription to Sanofi: Give us a refund.)

FEATURED STORIES

Recto stressed that Sanofi, manufacturer of Dengvaxia, is “duty-bound” to reimburse the government because all government purchases are mandatorily covered by warranty.

“Government has no choice but to follow the Procurement Law, which compels it to demand refund for the P3.5 billion in taxpayer’s money paid to the French manufacturer of ineffective dengue vaccines,” Recto said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“RA 9184 has an anti-lemon provision. It is discussed extensively in Section 62, which deals with faulty, defective substandard goods and services. The bottomline is that the government is entitled to restitution,” Recto said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Recto noted that RA 9184 requires the supplier to post “retention money,” which the government will hold on to until the vaccines’ warranty has lapsed. This is to ensure that the goods supplied are free from defects, he explained.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator likened the practice to public works involving defects on roads, saying that they shall be repaired or replaced “at the cost of the contractor” within a given period from date of delivery.

Recto said if Sanofi defies the demand for refund, the firm’s properties shall be subject to attachment or garnishment proceedings to recover the costs, citing Section 65 of the Procurement Law.

Article continues after this advertisement

The “no return, no exchange policy” does not apply to government purchases, Recto said. “Bumili ka nga ng plantsang sira, pwede mo isauli, ito pa kaya (When you buy a broken iron, you can return it; how much more this).” /je

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Dengvaxia, Recto, refund

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.