Jeepney strike: Gov’t threatens drivers, operators … again | Inquirer News

Jeepney strike: Gov’t threatens drivers, operators … again

By: - Reporter / @jovicyeeINQ
/ 07:39 AM November 30, 2017

transport strike

A protester holds a poster during a jeepney transport strike in Manila on October 16, 2017.
Jeepney drivers and activists staged a nationwide transport strike in protest against the government’s plan to phase out the ubiquitous passenger jeepney as part of a modernization campaign to turn the Philippines’ main form of public transport green. AFP FILE

Transportation Secretary Arthur Tugade has had enough of jeepney drivers complaining about the government’s modernization program, warning on Wednesday that they would be revoking the franchises to operate as well as the licenses of drivers who would join in next week’s two-day strike.

Apparently fed up by the repeated strikes mounted by militant transport group Piston this year, Tugade said the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) and the Land Transportation Office (LTO) would already take action against drivers who would participate in the strike on December 4 and 5.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have invited Piston to dialogues, but still they insisted on holding strikes. Other transport groups sat down with us and we discussed the program together. Why can’t Piston do that? I am positive that when they do, they will understand and they will agree that it is time to overhaul the public transportation system,” Tugade said in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

Tugade was referring to the transport group Pinagkaisang Samahan ng mga Tsuper at Operator Nationwide or Piston.

On Tuesday, Piston national president George San Mateo said they would hold their fourth nationwide strike next week to oppose the Duterte administration’s plan to phase out by January next year old and dilapidated jeepneys.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said they were not totally against the modernization program, only that they were wary of its implementation especially that it appears that it is mainly being used as a “front” to sell vehicles that are compliant to Euro-4 emission standards and electric-powered models.

Article continues after this advertisement

San Mateo pointed out that the Department of Transportation (DOTr) had yet to release its route rationalization plan, which is a prerequisite for the issuance of new franchises.

Article continues after this advertisement

Following Tugade’s warning, San Mateo stressed that he was “willing” to go to jail for his views on the DOTr’s largest non-infrastructure program and for fighting for the rights of jeepney drivers.

Leah Quiambao, assistant transport secretary for communications, maintained that Tugade’s warning isn’t an infringement on the group’s right to assemble and freedom of expression.

Article continues after this advertisement

She pointed out that they could revoke a jeepney franchise since it was merely a “privilege granted by the state.”

“Among the conditions upon the grant of franchise is that the [public utility vehicles] will not abandon their routes/lines and prejudice our commuters. Hence, ‘tigil-pasada’ is among the grounds for revocation of franchise,” Quiambao said.

The government has threatened to revoke the franchises of jeepneys whose drivers join transport strikes, but none have been reported cancelled so far.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In the previous transport strikes held this year, the LTFRB has filed several cases against operators who stopped operations to voice their concerns against the modernization program. To date though, the board has yet to revoke any franchise. /cbb

TAGS: George San Mateo, jeepney, LTFRB, LTO, News, Piston

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.