Separate verdicts seen in Maguindanao massacre trial | Inquirer News
SUPREME COURT PROCEDURE

Separate verdicts seen in Maguindanao massacre trial

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 07:12 AM November 23, 2017

As the nation marks the eighth year since the Maguindanao massacre on Thursday, the Supreme Court said decisions may be handed down separately for each of the more than 100 accused of murdering 58 people who were killed in the carnage.

Of nearly 200 accused, only 115 had been arrested, including the alleged mastermind, former Maguindanao Gov. Andal Ampatuan Sr., who died two years ago of a heart attack.

The Public Information Office (PIO) of the Supreme Court said the prosecution had completed presenting its evidence against all the principal suspects, except Andal Ampatuan Jr., whose bail petition was denied by the trial court.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 221 trying the case said there was strong evidence against him.

FEATURED STORIES

It was now the turn of the accused to present their “evidence in chief” and only 103 of the original respondents remain on trial, the PIO said.

“As soon as the accused have rested their presentation of evidence, their respective cases may already be submitted for the decision of the court,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The RTC could hand down verdicts on each of the accused without waiting for other respondents to complete the presentation of their own evidence, it said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court presided by Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes has heard 166 prosecution and 107 defense witnesses.

On Nov. 23, 2009, armed followers of the Ampatuan clan allegedly gunned down 58 people, including 32 media workers, on a hilltop in Ampatuan town in the worst election violence in the country and the bloodiest attack against the press in the world. —With a report from Jhesset O. Enano

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.