Bongbong Marcos scores in new PET order vs Comelec | Inquirer News

Bongbong Marcos scores in new PET order vs Comelec

Former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO/NINO JESUS ORBETA

The Supreme Court sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) has ruled that the Commission on Elections (Comelec) should pay for the storage fees of election materials related to the protest of former Sen. Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. against Vice President Leni Robredo.

Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez said the poll body had no plans yet to file an appeal regarding the PET’s Oct. 10 decision.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Comelec accepts the ruling of the PET in the spirit of facilitating the resolution of this case,” Jimenez said.

FEATURED STORIES

The poll body earlier told the PET that Marcos should shoulder the storage fees for ballot boxes and other election materials kept abroad because those could not be shipped back to the country following the Precautionary Protective Order (PPO) issued by the PET.

The Comelec claimed that since the PPO instructed them to preserve and safeguard the integrity of the ballots and other election materials, they could not bring them back to the Comelec office in Manila and they had to be stocked in the foreign posts which resulted in additional costs.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the PET rejected the Comelec’s argument, saying the PPO did not prohibit them from transferring the ballots and other materials to Manila.

“The Comelec was merely required to preserve and safeguard their integrity. Thus, the Comelec’s proffered reason that its faithful compliance to the PPO has no basis,” the PET resolution stated.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Leni Robredo, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.