Ombudsman a demotion for SC justice, says Miriam | Inquirer News
Close  

Ombudsman a demotion for SC justice, says Miriam

MANILA, Philippines—Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago on Wednesday questioned Supreme Court (SC) Associate Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales’ decision to accept her nomination to become the next Ombudsman.

In case Carpio-Morales gets the appointment, it would be a “demotion” for someone who is already at the apex of one’s legal career, according to the senator.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s very difficult to reconcile in the mind a person who has already been there up the bench (to want) to go down to a counsel’s table,” she added.

While there had been retired SC justices who accepted new posts, she noted that the subsequent assignments were “on the level of their intellectual supremacy as justices.” Carpio-Morales, said to be the Palace’s preference to be the next Ombudsman, will retire on June 19 when she reaches 70 years old.

FEATURED STORIES

Santiago cited the case of former Justice Cecilia Muñoz-Palma, who later headed the Constitutional Convention.

The senator also warned that appointing high court justices to new posts after their retirement might influence that way cases were decided.

“It might set a very dangerous precedent because if the President keeps on appointing retired Supreme Court justices, it could be that the President might be able to influence the outcome of certain cases by holding out the promise that he could appoint after retirement certain people,” she said.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Associate Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales, Miriam Defensor-Santiago, nomination, Ombudsman
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

News that matters

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.