House panel favors giving CHR more teeth | Inquirer News

House panel favors giving CHR more teeth

/ 07:40 AM August 17, 2017

State agencies have opposed some provisions of proposed laws to expand the powers of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR), including granting the constitutional body the authority to prosecute offenders.

In a hearing on Tuesday at the House of Representatives, human rights committee chair and Zambales 2nd District Rep. Cheryl Deloso-Montalla said the CHR had her committee’s “unwavering support” despite Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez’s threat last week not to allocate funds for it in the 2018 budget.

“With the threat of zero budget and abolition of the commission, the future seems bleak for human rights,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

CHR chair Chito Gascon said despite the Speaker’s “weighty” statement, “We believe truth and reason will prevail.”

FEATURED STORIES

Tuesday’s hearing tackled bills filed by Representatives Rene Relampagos (Bohol), Gary Alejano (Magdalo), Lawrence Fortun (Agusan del Norte), Evelina Escudero (Sorsogon) and Gus Tambunting (Parañaque City).

The bills would allow CHR to prosecute human rights violations—instead of only investigating them—and suspend nonimpeachable officials pending investigation.

Article continues after this advertisement

They would also provide fiscal autonomy to the CHR and give it its own charter to replace Executive Order No. 163, which created it in 1987.

Article continues after this advertisement

State Counsel Gisela Mendoza expressed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ)  “strong reservations on the prosecutorial functions of the CHR.”

Article continues after this advertisement

She said the DOJ, which is the government’s chief investigative and prosecutorial arm, would elaborate on its stance in a position paper.

Police Supt. Veronica Peñalosa, chief of Policy Capability Development Division of the Philippine National Police Human Rights Affairs Office, opposed a proposal allowing CHR personnel to inspect government agencies, military installations, schools, prisons and detention facilities without prior notice.

Article continues after this advertisement

She also opposed a proposal that would give no statute of limitations to the investigations of human rights violations.

Peñalosa was against denying a “human rights clearance” to a public official unless a case against that official had been decided with finality.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Undersecretary Severo Catura of the Presidential Human Rights Committee questioned the need for the bill filed by Bayan Muna party-list Rep. Carlos Isagani Zarate defining the rights of “human rights defenders” and protecting them.

TAGS: Chito Gascon, CHR

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.