Lifting TRO on contraceptive implants best left to SC - CBCP official | Inquirer News

Lifting TRO on contraceptive implants best left to SC – CBCP official

/ 04:54 AM July 26, 2017

Contraceptives (INQUIRER FILE PHOTO)

MANILA — While President Duterte is free to say what he wants for the reproductive health law, the issue of the temporary restraining order on contraceptive implants is best left to the Supreme Court, according to an official of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines.

President Duterte called for the lifting of the TRO on Republic Act 10354 or the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law, during his State of the Nation Address last Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The President is free to express his wishes about the reproductive health law but the matter is still in the hands of the Supreme Court,” said Fr. Jerome Secillano on Tuesday.

FEATURED STORIES

Secillano is the executive secretary of the CBCP’s permanent committee on public affairs.

On Monday, Duterte said the TRO on contraceptive implants has stymied the implementation of the RPRH law.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that the Supreme Court should reconsider the TRO on subdermal contraceptive implants Implanon and Implanon NXT.

Article continues after this advertisement

In August 2016, the high court issued a TRO on the contraceptive implants.

Article continues after this advertisement

Another TRO was issued, preventing the Food and Drug Administration from renewing the certificates of product registration of other contraceptive products.

In May 2017, the Supreme Court said the government could proceed with its reproductive health programs because the injunction order issued was not for all family planning supplies.

Article continues after this advertisement

Secillano said it would be up to the high court to decide on the issue of the TRO on the contraceptive implants.

“Let the court decide about the efficacy and soundness of the measure. Only then can we have closure on the matter,” he said.

He added that the Catholic Church has opposed and would continue to oppose the RPRH law.

“There are alternatives to spacing the number of children and that it should not be viewed as a poverty measure,” Secillano said.  SFM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: courts, Health, litigation, Rodrigo Duterte, trials

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.