outbrain
Close  
LEGISLATIVE INQUIRY

MRT 3 maintenance contractor no-show in Senate panel hearing

Marlo dela Cruz, who was found to be an incorporator of all three companies that won the contracts to maintain the trains of Metro Rail Transit 3 (MRT 3) on Edsa, was a no-show again at the resumption on Tuesday of the hearing conducted by the Senate committee on public services.

Sen. Grace Poe, chair of the committee, said the Office of the Senate Sergeant at Arms (Ossa) had failed to serve the subpoena for Dela Cruz to attend the hearing because he was not at the address he had given to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ADVERTISEMENT

It turned out that the house was previously registered in the name of Wilfredo dela Cruz, brother of the incorporator.

Train glitches

The many changes in the maintenance providers of MRT 3 were among the reasons its trains continue to have glitches, leading to allegations of mismanagement and the Senate inquiry.

FEATURED STORIES

After Sumitumo’s maintenance contract expired, former Transportation Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya signed the negotiated bid contract of PH Trams, which partnered with CB&T.

PH Trams won the negotiated bid to maintain and repair MRT 3 trains in 2012 until August 2013 even if it had just incorporated itself with small capitalization two months before the bidding.

After PH Trams, the contract was awarded to Global APT, which serviced the trains up to 2014. Busan Rails Inc. took over Global APT and still handles the job.

Sandiganbayan case

Poe said she got a letter from Dela Cruz’s lawyer, Richard Leonard Cruz, who advised her committee “on the propriety of compelling the attendance of his client in the legislative inquiry.”

Cruz invoked the sub judice rule as his client already had a pending case in the Sandiganbayan on the latter’s alleged culpability in the MRT maintenance irregularities. Cruz also invoked his client’s right against self-incrimination.

But Poe reminded Cruz that the sub judice rule was not applicable to legislative inquiries as the purpose of the inquiry was in aid of legislation.

Still, she said Dela Cruz could invoke such right “only when a question propounded to him tends to elicit an answer that will incriminate him” but added that the committee would still have to determine whether such right was properly invoked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Poe then directed the Ossa to go to Cruz’s law office, Leynes Lozada-Marquez, so it could furnish it with a copy of the subpoena and to find out the address of its client.

Former MRT3 Gen. Manager Atty. Al Vitangcol  at the Senate inquiry into the MRT by Sen. Grace Poe and Sen. JV Ejercito. INQUIRER PHOTO/LYN RILLON

Former MRT3 Gen. Manager Atty. Al Vitangcol at the Senate inquiry into the MRT by Sen. Grace Poe and Sen. JV Ejercito. INQUIRER PHOTO/LYN RILLON

Poe told reporters that Dela Cruz should be given the chance to air his side on why his companies were able to bag the maintenance contracts.

Rigged bidding?

But with his absence at the hearing, there was a growing suspicion that the conduct of the bidding was rigged or that the group of Dela Cruz had “undue advantage because they know people from the inside,” the senator said.

Poe noted that Roel Bacar, president of CB&T or PH Trams’ partner, had told the hearing that Dela Cruz was close to the old ruling Liberal Party to which former Transportation Secretary Mar Roxas and Abaya belonged.

Read Next
EDITORS' PICK
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: maintenance contractor, MRT 3, Senate panel
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.