Duterte appeases Congress over ‘lobby money’ remark | Inquirer News

Duterte appeases Congress over ‘lobby money’ remark

/ 05:40 AM May 11, 2017

President Duterte himself has clarified his claim that “lobby money” was behind the Commission on Appointments’ (CA) rejection of Gina Lopez as Environment secretary, Malacañang said on Wednesday.

Presidential spokesperson Ernesto Abella said Mr. Duterte told Cabinet officials that he did not mean to say lawmakers were bribed to reject Lopez.

Lobbying does not necessarily involve money, said Abella, adding that Mr. Duterte made the clarification during a Cabinet meeting on Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

“He said basically that [lobbying] is a legal thing that you can actually exercise in order to persuade one particular position,” Abella quoted Mr. Duterte as saying.

FEATURED STORIES

“He was saying, in a sense, he was clarifying last night it was not a pejorative accusation that money was transferred or that money was exchanged,” he added.

When it was pointed out to him that the term “lobby money” came from the President, he said Mr. Duterte only glossed his remark.

Article continues after this advertisement

He also said he could not say if the President’s explanation would stop the proposed congressional probe of the alleged “lobby money” statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“But certainly, he clarified his position, he added more light to his statement,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

As for the supposed pressure to reject Lopez, Abella said this had come from “interested parties,” but the President did not specify who these were.

On the other hand, Sen. Panfilo Lacson, who was one of those who voted against Lopez and was offended by the President’s remark, said it was time to move on from the CA lobby issue.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Now that the President has clarified his statement, it’s time to move on from the ugly Lopez episode in the Commission on Appointments,” Lacson said after the Palace’s clarification.

Lacson said he did not regret his decision knowing he did “the right thing” based on his evaluation.

He said that he felt it necessary to explain why he did not vote for Lopez’s confirmation despite the CA’s secret voting system because he wanted to “set the record straight.”—LEILA B. SALAVERRIA

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: lobby money

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.