SC nixes Jinggoy’s bid to dismiss | Inquirer News

SC nixes Jinggoy’s bid to dismiss

Sandiganbayan, former Senator Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada, pork barrel scam, graft charges, motion for reconsideration

Former Sen. Jinggoy Estrada. FILE PHOTO

BAGUIO CITY—Sticking to its earlier ruling, the Supreme Court in an en banc session here on Tuesday dismissed with finality the motion for reconsideration filed by former Sen. Jinggoy Estrada of the Sandiganbayan decisions regarding his graft and plunder cases.

Estrada, son of former President and now Manila Mayor Joseph Estrada, had failed to convince the antigraft court to junk the graft charges he faced when he argued that these cases were redundant and formed part of the plunder charges filed against him in connection with the so-called pork barrel scam uncovered in 2013.

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada, who has been held in Camp Crame since June 2014, is facing trial for plunder, a nonbailable offense, and 11 counts of graft for allegedly siphoning off his pork barrel, officially known as Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), to bogus foundations owned by businesswoman Janet Lim-Napoles.

FEATURED STORIES

Estrada was accused of conspiring with Napoles in funneling his PDAF into alleged ghost projects in exchange for P183 million in kickbacks.

The Sandiganbayan rejected Estrada’s petition, saying that the plunder charge involved transactions from 2004 to 2012. The graft cases, however, involved transactions from 2008 to 2010.

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada elevated the matter to the Supreme Court, accusing the Sandiganbayan of grave abuse of discretion.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a Jan. 24 resolution, however, the high court dismissed Estrada’s petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Tuesday, the court again ruled that the Sandiganbayan had not committed any “grave abuse of discretion” when it decided against Estrada’s bid to suppress disbursement reports from the trail as well as the testimony of principal whistle-blower Benhur Luy, who exposed the pork barrel scam.

It also upheld the decision of the Sandiganbayan to let the Office of the Ombudsman use Luy’s disbursement reports as evidence.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.