LPGMA party-list Rep. Arnel Ty, 8 others face cartel raps | Inquirer News

LPGMA party-list Rep. Arnel Ty, 8 others face cartel raps

By: - Reporter / @JeromeAningINQ
/ 02:53 AM November 05, 2011

The Department of Justice on Friday recommended the filing of charges against LPGMA party-list Rep. Arnel Ty and eight others for allegedly forcing LPG dealers to rollback prices of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in violation of free trade laws.

The 10-page resolution penned by prosecutor Cesar Angelo Chavez III and approved by Prosecutor-General Claro Arellano, found “probable cause” to cite the lawmaker and his associates for using “price signalling” to dictate LPG prices on their competitors, a violation of of anticartel provisions of the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act.

Aside from Ty, others ordered charged were Danilo Chua, Alison Sy, Rene Rosell, Ronnie Sevillana, Mar Dave Tang, Virginia Cid, Bonifacio Eleria and Antonio del Rosario—all stockholders, directors and officers of LPG-selling or distributing firms and members of the LPG Marketers Association that Ty represents in Congress.

Article continues after this advertisement

The complainant, Federation of Philippine Industries chair Jesus Arranza, said the LPGMA unduly forced nonmembers to roll back prices of their LPG tanks whenever Ty made an announcement through the media that there would be a rollback.

FEATURED STORIES

The announcement made by Ty, according to the complaint, resulted in “combination and/or concerted action” tantamount to “cartelization” as defined by Section 11 (a) of Republic Act 8479 and to “monopolies and combinations in restraint of trade” as defined by Article 186 of the Revised Penal Code.

The resolution noted that other members of the LPGMA did not object and apparently unanimously consented to the rollback declarations made by Ty. “In competition law, this is part of a strategy that includes a practice known as ‘price signalling,’” the resolution added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The resolution said this was effectively “a restraint on trade and free competition” which the law seeks to avert.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.