Lawmakers skewer Lopez's leadership at DENR | Inquirer News

Lawmakers skewer Lopez’s leadership at DENR

Surigao Sur solon slams Lopez's whimsical moves; Surigao Norte lawmaker asks, 'Where will mining workers go?'
By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 02:31 PM March 14, 2017

gina lopez


Environment and Natural Resources Secretary Regina Lopez during the Commission on Appointments hearing at the Senate on March 8, 2017. (INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE)

MANILA — A no-show at a congressional inquiry on her mining policies, Environment Secretary Gina Lopez did not escape a skewering from lawmakers who criticized her “highly illegal” and “whimsical” orders shutting down or suspending mines.

The embattled Lopez was abroad and could not make it to Tuesday’s hearing of the House good government and public accountability committee, but her absence did not stop the congressmen — some with their own mining interests or representing districts affected by the closure orders — from raising their grievances against her.

Article continues after this advertisement

Surigao del Sur Rep. Johnny Pimentel, chair of the House panel, said it was clear Lopez did not follow the recommendations of her own mining audit team to penalize only erring mining companies based on their violations, and instead chose to summarily shut down operations.

FEATURED STORIES

“So, if we study it, this is only on the whim of Secretary Lopez who overruled the technical committee, ‘no, this is not right.’ It’s not an objective view, but the subjective view of Secretary Lopez, and that is highly illegal,” he said.

“If you close down a mine, you have to lay down the reason. It’s like when a policeman arrests a person, he can’t just say ‘I will jail you,’ without saying why,” said Pimentel, whose family has been into mining for some time.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last month, Lopez ordered 23 mines closed down and suspended five others. She also canceled 75 mineral production sharing agreements located in watersheds. This was months after an audit of mining operations had resulted in recommendations for the suspension of 20 mining projects.

Article continues after this advertisement

At the hearing, former Mines and Geosciences Bureau head Leo Jasareno, now a consultant for the environment department, clarified that the mining companies ordered shut had all submitted appeals, effectively staying the closure.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If a mining company files a motion for reconsideration, or appeals to the President, then her (Lopez’) decision is stayed… so no mine is closed at the moment,” he said.

Surigao del Norte Rep. Robert Barbers assailed the “arbitrary” closure orders and questioned the composition of the mining audit team.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Nobody knows who the mining audit members are. I was told one of the members of the audit team is a personality coming from an NGO that is anti-mining — how can that be above board? How was the mining audit conducted? Did they go to the site? Did they bring technical people over?” he said.

He said he was neither a patron nor protector of the mining companies, but was only looking out for his constituents who would be adversely  affected by the shutdown of mine operations.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We will lose thousands of jobs in my district. We have no other industry except mining. If you close these down, where do they go? They won’t go to you or the Secretary. They come to me,” Barbers said.  SFM/rga

TAGS: closure of mines, congressmen, Gina Lopez, lawmakers, Legislators, Leo Jasareno, Mining, mining lobby, mining sector, Politics, Quarrying

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.