Dismissal of admin raps vs Rizal execs affirmed | Inquirer News

Dismissal of admin raps vs Rizal execs affirmed

/ 04:15 AM February 16, 2017

The Court of Appeals (CA) has denied the Office of the Ombudsman’s appeal on its September decision reversing the grave misconduct ruling against seven former procurement officials of Rizal province over the 2004 fertilizer fund scam.

In an eight-page resolution dated Dec. 28, the appellate court’s Fourth Division said the Task Force Abono of the Ombudsman’s Field Investigation Office did not raise new issues to warrant the reversal of its Sept. 2 decision.

Cleared of administrative liability were former bids and awards committee (BAC) members: Eugene Durusan, Eduardo Torres, Cecilia Almajose, Romulo Arcilla Jr., Victorina Olea, Virgilio Esguerra, and Danilo Rumbawa.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The evidence holding petitioners liable for grave misconduct is weak. A public officer shall be liable for grave misconduct only when the elements of corruption, clear intent to violate the law or flagrant disregard of established rule are manifest,” Justice Noel G. Tijam said in the resolution.

FEATURED STORIES

The CA resolution was recently released by the camp of former Gov. Casimiro Ynares Jr. after state prosecutors last week filed criminal graft charges against him and the BAC members at the Sandiganbayan over the same controversy.

In June 2014, the Ombudsman found the BAC officials guilty in the separate administrative case for dishonesty, grave misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service. They were ordered dismissed and banned from public office.

Article continues after this advertisement

This was in connection with the procurement without public bidding of P3.597-million worth of allegedly overpriced fertilizers.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Court of Appeals

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.