Palace pooh-poohs opposition to drug war | Inquirer News

Palace pooh-poohs opposition to drug war

/ 08:24 AM February 12, 2017

agnes callamard

UN special rapporteur Agnes Callamard said the drug war being waged by the administration of President Rodrigo Duterte was reaching a ‘tipping point’ as Filipinos were slowly criticizing the antinarcotics campaign. Recent surveys however show Filipinos showing approval of the government’s antidrug drive. AFP FILE

The government on Saturday dismissed a statement by UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings Agnes Callamard that opposition to President Duterte’s war on drugs was rising.

Callamard was quoted as saying recently in Thailand that the more than 7,000 deaths attributed to the crackdown fostered a sense of impunity that could lead to increased lawlessness and violence. She warned that the situation was at a “tipping point” with many Filipinos slowly criticizing the war.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Her statement that there’s a mounting opposition, it’s a minority voice that favors liberal politics. On the other hand, we’re not saying they’re wrong, we’re saying that yes, we understand where they’re coming from,” presidential spokesperson, Ernesto Abella, said over the government-run Radyo ng Bayan.

FEATURED STORIES

He said that based on the situation on the ground, public opinion remains on the side of Mr. Duterte, and that those criticizing the narcotics war were mostly from the outside.

“So in terms of support, where do you expect support? Do you expect support to come from outside or do you expect support from inside?” Abella said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Mainly what we hear from outside are criticisms. And I suppose that it’s also their role. But we also have to understand that these critics are also voices of other forces” that have their own agenda, he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The President will continue his campaign, but likely change his strategies along the way if he sees fit to do so, he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“He is not hard-headed. But he is very persistent in pursuing and making sure that, as he says, the apparatus of drugs is destroyed,” Abella said.

The government recently stopped the antidrug campaign after several cops were implicated in the killing of Korean businessman Jee Ick-joo last year. Jee was killed inside Camp Crame and his remains later flushed down the toilet, but the rogue cops still collected ransom money from his grieving wife.

Article continues after this advertisement

Abella said the President has been listening to concerns raised about the campaign.

But he has been reacting to some comments rather strongly because he had felt that these were “not really founded on Philippine reality,” Abella said.

“There is a different reality in the Philippines and that is what he insists,” he added.

Abella was apparently referring to Colombia’s former President Cesar Gaviria who had offered him advice on his drug war and warned him not make the same mistakes he did.

Gaviria had cautioned Mr. Duterte on his heavy-handed approach to the drug war, saying that “throwing more soldiers and police at the drug users is not just a waste of money but can actually make the problem worse.”

Mr. Duterte subsequently branded Gaviria an “idiot.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Mr. Duterte had stressed that the Philippines was different from Colombia because the police here were  battling shabu. Colombia dealt with cocaine and heroin, and only managed to address the problem because of money from the United States./rga

TAGS: Drug war, Drugs, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.