'Kompromat': Soviet-era tool to blackmail opponents | Inquirer News

‘Kompromat’: Soviet-era tool to blackmail opponents

/ 12:11 PM January 12, 2017

(FILES) This file photo taken on March 25, 2014 shows the logo of news website BuzzFeed is seen on a computer screen in Washington. A media firestorm erupted January 11, 2017 after BuzzFeed published an unverified report with salacious details on purported intelligence gathered by Russia on President-elect Donald Trump. / AFP PHOTO / NICHOLAS KAMM

This file photo taken on March 25, 2014, shows the logo of news website BuzzFeed is seen on a computer screen in Washington.
A media firestorm erupted January 11, 2017 after BuzzFeed published an unverified report with salacious details on purported intelligence gathered by Russia on President-elect Donald Trump. AFP

MOSCOW, Russia — Reports that Russian intelligence gathered compromising information about US President-elect Donald Trump have stirred memories of the dark art of “kompromat,” a Soviet-era form of blackmail used to shame adversaries.

The practice was widely used by the Soviet Union’s secret services to squeeze information out of Western diplomats during the Cold War and has left many ruined victims in its wake.

Article continues after this advertisement

The method — which sometimes involves tapped phones, hidden cameras and honey traps — outlived the Soviet Union and continues to be used by the KGB security service’s successor agency, the FSB Federal Security Service.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Russians claim to have compromising info on Trump — report

“Secret services throughout the world use this,” Mikhail Lyubimov, who long headed the KGB’s operations against Britain and Scandinavian countries and is now a writer, told AFP.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We are not the only ones.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Moscow denied the claims Wednesday that it had gathered compromising material against Trump, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissing them as a “total fake” and “an obvious attempt to harm our bilateral relations.”

Article continues after this advertisement

US media outlet Buzzfeed published, without corroborating its contents, a 35-page dossier of memos describing sex videos involving prostitutes filmed during a 2013 visit by Trump to a luxury Moscow hotel, supposedly as a potential means for blackmail.

Many news outlets did not reveal details of the claims, as they could not be confirmed. CNN said the dossier originally came in part from an ex-British MI-6 operative hired by other US presidential contenders to dig up dirt on Trump.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lyubimov said he thought the claims against Trump were an “invention.”

“He wasn’t of any interest when he was here,” Lyubimov said. “This is simply Obama’s farewell jab. This is a great card that will continue to be played against Trump for a long time.”

Diplomat traps

Although Russia is not the only country that uses blackmail to discredit opponents, Moscow has a long history of successfully targeting foreign diplomats with “kompromat”, as well as rival businessmen, politicians and activists.

In the mid-1950s, junior naval attaché to the British embassy in Moscow, John Vassall, was secretly photographed with a homosexual partner at a time when same-sex relations were banned in Britain.

The KGB used the compromising photographs to blackmail Vassall to serve as one of its agents

John Profumo, former British government minister whose name became associated with the sex and espionage scandal that forced his resignation in 1963, fell into a similar trap.

He fell for Christine Keeler, a 19-year-old prostitute — who also happened to be in a relationship with a Russian intelligence officer and the Soviet assistant naval attaché in London.

In 1964, France’s ambassador to Moscow, Maurice Dejean, was caught having sexual relations with a young Russian woman, leading to his firing by Charles de Gaulle.

Most recently, in 2009, a British diplomat stationed in Moscow resigned after a video showing him with two prostitutes emerged online.

“Blackmail through sex is something as timeless as sex itself,” Lyubimov said.

A ‘boomerang’

The use of blackmail against foreign diplomats has become rarer in the post-Soviet era. In the 1990s “kompromat” was mostly used among Russian politicians and businessman trying to get ahead.

Some of the most famous “kompromat wars” happened in the mid-1990s when powerful Russian oligarchs slugged it out against each other in lucrative battles for the privatization of Soviet state assets.

Many of those business barons also held media companies that splashed ugly allegations against their opponents at will.

Prosecutor General Yury Skuratov was dismissed in 1999 after a video showing a man resembling him having sex with two women was broadcast on the news.

Alleged footage of Mikhail Kasyanov, a former prime minister turned opposition leader, having sex with a political activist was aired last year by a Kremlin-friendly television channel ahead of parliamentary elections.

Other opposition figures, including politicians and journalists, were targeted in a 2010 series of leaks of compromising sex videos involving a young woman named Yekaterina Gerasimova, who they said was a model recruited by either the FSB or a pro-Kremlin youth organization called Nashi.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“‘Kompromat’ is a boomerang of sorts,” Lyubimov said. “A person cannot work for a long time under the threat of ‘kompromat’ and then break down and easily turn into an enemy. It’s a dangerous thing.”/rga

TAGS: Blackmail, espionage, kompromat, News, Russia

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.