Militant group claims 2017 budget tainted with ‘new pork’ | Inquirer News

Militant group claims 2017 budget tainted with ‘new pork’

/ 01:51 PM January 09, 2017

Benjamin Diokno

Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno said he did not find anything wrong with lawmakers identifying projects to be funded in the national budget. Such projects, he said, did not violate the Supreme Court’s decision declaring pork barrel funds as unconstitutional. TOTO LOZANO / PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO

Change is coming?

A militant group said nothing much has changed after President Duterte allowed the existence of a graft-ridden pork barrel system in the P3.35-trillion national budget this year.

Article continues after this advertisement

Allowing lawmakers to propose pet projects without unwritten allotments “seriously undermine the Duterte government’s pledge of a clean, corruption-free government,” Renato Reyes Jr., secretary general of the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) said Monday.

FEATURED STORIES

“The proponents of the ‘new pork’ are showing us that not much has changed, it’s still business as usual,” Reyes said in a statement.

“There can be no ‘clean government’ if the regime of pork and patronage continues,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Special arrangements between the executive and congress — allowing lawmakers to propose projects based on unwritten ‘allotments’ even at the stage of crafting the national expenditure program by the executive– still reeks of pork,” Reyes said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the budget would “remain a breeding ground of corruption with the involvement of lawmakers in the identification of ‘pet projects.’”

Article continues after this advertisement

“There are many ways to skin a cat and just as many ways to consume pork through corruption,” he said.

Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno has maintained that there is no pork, formerly called the Priority Development Assistance Fund, in the 2017 General Appropriations Act.

Article continues after this advertisement

Diokno said he did not see anything wrong about the government funding pet projects the lawmakers recommended.

Reyes also questioned the Duterte administration for prioritizing the congressional pork over the Social Security System pension hike, a promise Duterte made during the campaign in May.

“How can government now justify not funding the SSS pension hike when it has funds for congressional pork?”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Fiscal policy should be geared towards meeting the needs of the people, not lining the pockets of politicians to secure their loyalty,” Reyes said. CBB/rga

TAGS: News, PDAF, Pork barrel

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.