Steel Corp. sues ex-Insurance Commissioner for inaction on claim | Inquirer News

Steel Corp. sues ex-Insurance Commissioner for inaction on claim

/ 12:04 PM December 19, 2016
Insurance Commissioner Emmanuel Dooc was appointed president and chief executive officer of the Social Security System by President Duterte on Nov. 15, 2016. (Photo taken from official website of the Insurance Commission at )

Former Insurance Commissioner Emmanuel Dooc (Photo taken from official website of the Insurance Commission at )

The president of the country’s last homegrown steel mill has sued former Insurance Commissioner Emmanuel Dooc for failing to act right away on his administrative complaints against nine insurers.

Steel Corp. of the Philippines (SCP) president Abeto Uy, joined by the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC), asked the Office of the Ombudsman to impose administrative sanctions against Dooc.


Even as SCP wrote a letter to President Rodrigo Duterte complaining about Dooc, he recently appointed his fellow San Beda College alumnus as president and chief executive officer of the Social Security System (SSS).

In a 16-page complaint on Monday, Uy accused Dooc of violating Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act for causing undue injury to SCP through manifest partiality, bad faith, or gross inexcusable negligence.


“As far as the complaints of SCP were concerned, he did not act on them, hence, he did not perform his duty of monitoring the activities of the insurers and obliging them to comply with what the law requires them to do,” the complaint read.

“With the above actuations of Respondent Dooc, it is now doubtful if the Commission indeed is there to protect the insuring public, or in actuality protects the interest of the insurance companies,” it added.

The case arose from two complaints filed before the IC seeking sanctions against two groups of insurers for rejecting its claims of US$1.4 million over a 2008 fire at its cold rolling mill and US$36.7 million over a 2009 fire at its plant in Balayan, Batangas.

SCP filed on Oct. 29, 2009, its “unfair claims settlement” complaint against the first set of insurers: UCPB General Insurance Corporation (which insured 40% of the assets), Oriental Assurance Corporation (40%), PNB General Insurers Co., Inc. (15%), and Equitable Insurers Co., Inc. (5%).

The IC would only submit the case for resolution on July 13, 2015, six years after the complaint was filed. But, after a year passed without the IC issuing its ruling, Uy petitioned the Court of Appeals on July 28, 2016 to force the regulator to act on its complaint.

Only after the CA petition was filed did the IC finally issue its Aug. 19 decision dismissing the case in favor of the insurers, according to the complaint.

Uy said the period for the IC to resolve the case had long lapsed by that time, because Rule VI of the IC Rules of Procedure required that “all contested cases or incidents shall be decided within thirty (30) days from the date of submission for resolution.”


The second case filed on May 12, 2015, meanwhile, involved: Philippine Charter Insurance Corporation (now Charter Ping An Insurance Corporation) (29.5%), Mapfre Insular Insurance Corporation (26%), Asia Insurance Phils. Corp. (8.5%), New India Assurance Co., Ltd. (14%), and Malayan Insurance Co., Inc. (10%).

SCP sought the IC’s assistance in compelling all nine companies to identify their “reinsurers,” which are supposed to support the insurers as a way of managing huge risks.

But, Dooc only issued two orders on Aug. 31 and Sept. 5 requiring the second and first groups of insurers to comment on the request. For Uy, this was a “clear and manifest evasion” of the IC’s regulatory function.

The complaint noted that IC Circular Letters 2014-42 and 2014-07 required insurance companies to submit the particulars of their reinsurance treaties to the IC Reinsurance Division.

“Apparently, this is an ample proof that there is connivance and/or tolerance by the respondent [Dooc] of the failures of the insurance companies to comply with its circulars and/or the Insurance Code,” the complaint stated.

On Nov. 2, the Inquirer published Uy’s open letter to Duterte detailing his allegations against Dooc. The Inquirer also published Dooc’s reply on Nov. 8, which did not delve into the details of the complaints to avoid prejudging the pending CA case.

Uy told the Ombudsman that Dooc’s reply as published by the Inquirer “merely made clear that indeed he committed all the administrative errors complained about.”

Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III on Nov. 2 ordered an investigation into Uy’s allegations as contained in his open letter, but the results of the probe have yet to be made public. Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea would later announce in a Nov. 15 letter Duterte approved Dooc to the SSS.

In an interview with reporters at the Office of the Ombudsman, VACC legal counsel Ferdinand Topacio urged Duterte to “take a second look and reexamine his appointment of Commissioner Dooc.”

“He could do more harm at SSS now he is the president, especially if this is his attitude towards public service,” Topacio said. JE/rga

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Dooc, Emmanuel Dooc, Insurance Commission, Ombudsman, Steel Corp. of the Philippines
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

News that matters

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.