CTA affirms P934-M tax refund to SMC | Inquirer News

CTA affirms P934-M tax refund to SMC

/ 01:36 AM December 05, 2016

The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has affirmed a November 2014 decision ordering the government to refund San Miguel Corp. P934.12 million representing overpayments of excise taxes on its light-branded beer.

Voting 7-1, the tax court in an en banc decision dated Nov. 28 affirmed that San Mig Light was a separate brand of beer that should have been assessed lower excise taxes than the older San Miguel Beer Pale Pilsen brand.

The case stemmed from the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s imposition of an excise tax of P17.64 per liter on San Mig Light which it considered as a “variant” of the Pale Pilsen brand.

Article continues after this advertisement

Arguing that SML should have been taxed as a “new brand” at P13.28 per liter, SMC and its subsidiary, San Miguel Brewery Inc., sought the refund of overpayments made from August 2007 to December 2008.

FEATURED STORIES

The tax court in its recent ruling denied the BIR’s petition for review against the CTA Second Division’s Nov. 26, 2014

decision ordering it to issue a refund or a tax credit certificate to SMC and SMBI.

Article continues after this advertisement

In its 15-page decision, the CTA said reclassifying San Mig Light as a “variant” would violate Republic Act No. 9334, which prohibits the BIR from revising the classification of brands registered from 1997 to 2003.

Article continues after this advertisement

 

Article continues after this advertisement

New brand

Since the BIR initially granted San Mig Light’s registration as a new brand in October 1999, the decision stated that only Congress can reclassify the beer for taxation purposes.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court also noted that San Mig Light could not be considered a variant of “Pale Pilsen”—an older brand of beer with more calories but with the same 5 percent alcoholic content—because these words were not contained in the former’s name.

The decision also noted that the court has consistently confirmed the classification of San Mig Light as a new brand in at least three division rulings and four en banc decisions.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Business, tax refund

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.