Bongbong Marcos seeks charges vs Comelec, Smartmatic staff | Inquirer News

Bongbong Marcos seeks charges vs Comelec, Smartmatic staff

/ 04:31 AM November 12, 2016

Vice-Presidential candidate Bongbong Marcos slams the Smartmatic for changing a script on the transparency server of the PPCRV as he delivers a privilege speech at the resumption of the Senate session on Monday, May 23, 2016 RICHARD A. REYES

Ferdinand “Bongbong Marcos”  RICHARD A. REYES

The camp of defeated vice presidential bet Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. is urging the Department of Justice to file criminal charges against Commission on Elections (Comelec) staff and Smartmatic officers for allegedly tampering with the results of the May 9 elections.

Marcos’ poll adviser, former Abakada Rep. Jonathan dela Cruz, filed a petition with the DOJ on Friday to overturn the Nov. 3 decision of the Office of the City Prosecutor of Manila dismissing the cyber-crime cases he filed against three Comelec IT experts and four Smartmatic officers led by Venezuelan Marlon Garcia.

ADVERTISEMENT

In his 28-page petition, Dela Cruz said the OCP-Manila erroneously dismissed the cases when it failed to consider that prohibited acts under the Cybrecrime Prevention Act included “mala prohibita” (a conduct prohibited by law but not inherently evil) when it deemed the respondents as having acted with right or authority, and when it failed to appreciate the allegations in the complaint affidavit.

FEATURED STORIES

The respondents were charged for their unauthorized system change in the Transparency Server when they replaced “?” with “ñ” in the names of candidates while the transmission of votes was ongoing on the night of May 9, 2016.

Marcos lost by 263,000 votes to Vice President Leni Robredo. He claimed that he was cheated of 3 million votes.

“The act of ‘tweaking’ the script of the Transparency Server caused widespread anxiety and concern amongst the nation,” Dela Cruz said.

Dela Cruz said the respondents admitted making the unauthorized script change but the OCP-Manila ruled there was no evidence they did it in bad faith.

He said good or bad faith was immaterial because the authors of the law themselves said it was “enough that such acts are made without right or justifiable reason.”

The OCP-Manila argued there was “implied” right or authority to alter the script under the terms of the “Protocol of Escalation.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Comelec, Commission on Elections, criminal charges, Smartmatic

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.