With killing of drug suspects, is death penalty needed? | Inquirer News

With killing of drug suspects, is death penalty needed?

By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 04:31 AM November 10, 2016

In a country where summary killings of suspected criminals has become commonplace, is there still a need to revive the death penalty?

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman posed the question on Wednesday at a meeting of the House justice subcommittee on judicial reforms, which was hearing seven bills seeking the restoration of capital punishment for heinous crimes.

The subcommittee members were discussing procedural matters with regard to the questioning of resource persons from the Department of Justice, the Philippine National Police, and other stakeholders when Lagman raised the query.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said he wished to ask PNP Director General Ronald dela Rosa, who was absent but had sent representatives to the meeting, “whether as far as the PNP is concerned, with rampant and unabated extrajudicial killings, whether they still need the death penalty.”

FEATURED STORIES

Priority

The move to restore the death penalty is one of the priority legislative agenda of President Duterte’s allies in the House of Representatives.  Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez said in a recent interview in Japan he hoped to see the measure pass by December.

Article continues after this advertisement

At Wednesday’s hearing, Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption founding chair Dante Jimenez expressed his backing for capital punishment.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said that the argument was not a deterrent to crime was misleading. “The crime deterrence factor of the death penalty is clear in history,” he said, citing a decline in drug trafficking when a drug lord was executed during Martial Law.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Since the dawn of civilization the death penalty in varying modes of execution and for different crimes including pickpocketing in England was an additional punishment for crimes. Is this true?” he asked.

To which Jimenez replied: “I don’t have an idea honestly… I was born in 1952.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Irked by Jimenez’ sarcasm, Lagman said: “I will not further question this witness with this kind of answer,” prompting the presiding chair to ask the VACC leader to answer questions courteously.

Jimenez then apologized, saying he was just being honest and meant no offense.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: war on drugs

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.