Duterte mum on De Lima’s SC suit | Inquirer News

Duterte mum on De Lima’s SC suit

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 04:11 AM November 10, 2016

President Duterte declined to react on Wednesday on the legal challenge of archcritic Sen. Leila de Lima, who has filed a habeas data petition with the Supreme Court to stop him from securing private details about her personal life.

The tough-talking Chief Executive maintained that his statements regarding De Lima’s supposed hand in the narcotics trade were just intended to explain the extent of the country’s drug plague.

“I don’t know what are my sins. So I would rather leave it to the court,” the President told a news briefing before leaving for Malaysia.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If there are cases filed already, then let them be,” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

The President said inmates at the New Bilibid Prison (NBP) were still involved in drug trafficking even after the series of exposés with the help of corrupt jail guards and other public officials.

He said placing drug lords behind bars was not enough to stop them from running their illegal business, likening their operations to that of the drug mafias in Mexico.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Mine was just to make public… the corruption of the day and how drugs proliferate inside our penal institutions not only in [NBP], but in penal colonies,” he said in a mix of English and Filipino.

Article continues after this advertisement

“And to this day, they are still making money from the inside. Drug trafficking in the Philippines starts from the prisons,” he added.

He said drug traffickers should be “immobilized” because it was “not enough that they are in prison.” He did not explain further.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Leila de Lima, Supreme Court, war on drugs

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.