Pichay seeks dismissal of graft case | Inquirer News
Close  

Pichay seeks dismissal of graft case

/ 06:50 AM November 02, 2016
Rep. Prospero Pichay Jr.

Rep. Prospero Pichay Jr.

Surigao del Sur 1st District Rep. Prospero Pichay Jr., has asked the Sandiganbayan to throw out the graft charges filed against him for allegedly misusing P1.5 million in public funds to sponsor a 2010 chess tournament held in his honor.

In a 41-page omnibus motion, Pichay told the antigraft court’s Fifth Division that there was no probable cause to try him for graft and breach of ethical conduct and order his arrest.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Office of the Ombudsman has accused Pichay, an acting chair of the Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA), of giving the green light to release the funds to the National Chess Federation of the Philippines (NCFP) which he also headed.

Former LWUA acting deputy administrator Wilfredo Feleo joined Pichay in questioning the indictment.

FEATURED STORIES

Both said it was premature for the Ombudsman to declare the disbursement of funds as criminal, arguing that even the Commission on Audit (COA) has yet to complete its investigation on the disbursement.

Paper trail

“The appropriate office to make a conclusion as the propriety of the disbursement to the NCFP is COA, and not the Ombudsman, through the issuance of a proper audit report and only after an actual audit by COA auditors is conducted,” they said.

Although the Ombudsman submitted the paper trail showing the release of the LWUA funds to NCFP, the motion said it would not show the transaction was illegal.

Pichay and Feleo said they could not be held liable for violation of Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act because “they were never involved in the decision” to release the funds.

Pichay and Feleo said they could not be accused of bad faith because the charge sheet did not show any dishonest purpose or deliberate intent to do wrong.

They argued that there could not be “manifest partiality” in the case, because it would be impossible to favor NCFP when no other group was involved.

‘Unwarranted’

Without the COA audit, the motion noted that prosecutors cannot declare the release of the funds to be “unwarranted.” It added that the funds were already earmarked for sports and cultural development a year before NCFP requested the funds.

ADVERTISEMENT

The case arose from LWUA’s sponsorship of the second Chairman Prospero Pichay Jr. Cup International Chess Championship. The Ombudsman claimed that LWUA officials disregarded austerity measures to divert the funds in Pichay’s favor.

Also facing graft charges were LWUA senior deputy administrator Emmanuel Malicdem, and deceased administrator Daniel Landingin.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Local Water Utilities Administration, LWUA, National Chess Federation of the Philippines, NCFP, Office of the Ombudsman, Prospero Pichay Jr., Public funds, Sandiganbayan, Surigao del Sur
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

News that matters

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.