Court denies Jinggoy plea to junk charges | Inquirer News

Court denies Jinggoy plea to junk charges

/ 04:34 AM October 15, 2016

Senator Jose "Jinggoy" Estrada. AP FILE PHOTO

Senator Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada. AP FILE PHOTO

Former Sen. Jinggoy Estrada will still face trial for 11 counts of graft in connection with the alleged misuse of his Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or pork barrel, after the Sandiganbayan affirmed its denial of his bid seeking the dismissal of the cases.

In a 10-page resolution, the antigraft court’s Fifth Division denied Estrada’s appeal of its July ruling that first rejected his motion to dismiss the graft charges.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court maintained the graft cases were distinct from the plunder charge he is also facing for coursing his PDAF to fraudulent nongovernment organizations created by P10-billion pork scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.

FEATURED STORIES

Estrada’s petition to dismiss the 11 cases was anchored on the claim that the graft allegations were “mere ingredients” of the plunder indictment and should be “absorbed” instead in that one criminal case.

He also cited several Supreme Court rulings that purportedly showed that actions he is accused of committing as part of an alleged plunder charge could not be deemed to be separate criminal cases.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the court said the Estrada camp had relied on misinterpretations of the Supreme Court rulings which do not actually apply to his case.

Article continues after this advertisement

Some of these do not apply to his case because they concerned instances of multiple allegations contained in only one charge sheet. Meanwhile, a more complete reading of other rulings would actually show that the cases did not need to be “absorbed.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“It was likewise a disservice to the efficient administration of justice that so much time had to be spent to verify the assertions,” the court said.

Justice Rafael R. Lagos penned the resolution, with the concurrence of Justices Roland B. Jurado and Maria Theresa V. Mendoza-Arcega.

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada’s 11 counts of violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act concerned his alleged endorsement of his pork barrel to the bogus NGOs for various projects. Under the plunder charge, he is accused of receiving P183.8 million in kickbacks from Napoles or her representatives.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Graft, PDAF, Pork barrel, Sandiganbayan, Trial

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.