‘Ridiculous,’ says Drilon of Duterte’s ‘spokespersons’ | Inquirer News

‘Ridiculous,’ says Drilon of Duterte’s ‘spokespersons’

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 01:19 PM September 19, 2016

Senate President Franklin Drilon. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Senate President Franklin Drilon. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Saying it was “ridiculous” that many people were speaking in behalf of the President, Senate President Pro Tempore Franklin Drilon on Monday urged Malacañang to stop other Cabinet members, except for the official spokespersons, from “speaking for the President.”

Drilon noted that for almost three months since the new administration assumed office, too many people have been speaking in behalf of President Rodrigo Duterte.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator said Malacanang should only have one spokesperson and that should be either Secretary Ernesto Abella or Secretary Martin Andanar as head of the Presidential Communications Office (PCOO).

FEATURED STORIES

“Whether or not you admit that, whether or not you like it, marami kayong nagsasalita para sa Pangulo at hindi maganda. It’s a difficult job,” Drilon said during a hearing of the Senate committee on finance.

“For the sake of administration, you better have message discipline,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Ang dami-dami nyong nagsasalita. Siguro dahil bagong administration, everybody thinks that getting to the microphone for the press is something that’s good for their health. They do not realize that as you go along aba’y magkakaroon ka ng heart attack,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Andanar, who was defending the proposed budget of his office for 2017, agreed with Drilon’s observation.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Yes, I agree with you that there’s a perception that there are too many spokespersons and it’s not good. That’s why I had to put down my foot again in the last Cabinet meeting and I asked for the President’s support to allow the PCOO to have the opportunity to speak first,” he said.

Andanar said other Cabinet members would only be allowed to speak on their field of expertise or if there were pronouncements that needed to be clarified.

Article continues after this advertisement

Asked by Drilon how the President responded to the suggestion, Andanar said: “The President said yes, that it should go through the PCOO.”

At this point, Drilon suggested that the Executive Secretary relay the President’s statement to all Cabinet members.

“May I suggest that you get the Executive Secretary to issue an order to all Cabinet members [that] henceforth only Secretary Andanar, Secretary Abella and probably the Executive Secretary can speak for and behalf of the President,” the senator said.

“Nakakalungkot at nakakatawa kayo. Ang dami-dami nyong nagsasalita para sa Pangulo, kung sino-sino,” he added.

“Unless you translate that in an official, written communication, hindi ka papansinin ng mga kasamahan sa Malacnanang. Pag hindi mo gagawin yan, I’ll tell you Mr. Andnar, after one year baka magka-heart attack ka. Bata ka pa,” Drilon said.

Senator Loren Legarda, chair of the committee, agreed with Drilon’s suggestion.

“Just to be fair to them, it’s not the first time that this happened, every administration in the first three months …” Legarda said, but she was interrupted by Drilon.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“I’ve been in government for quite a while, ito ang pinakamatinding three months ng any administration. So many spokespersons are talking in behalf of the President so that one columnist already said your office is presidential miscommunication office,” Drilon said./rga

TAGS: Cabinet, Malacañang, News, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.