Ex-President Arroyo vindicated of graft charges | Inquirer News

Ex-President Arroyo vindicated of graft charges

By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 07:32 PM September 16, 2016

WAVING GOODBYE   Former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, shown in this 2012 file photo, might as well be waving goodbye to the plunder charges that the Supreme Court dismissed on Monday for “lack of evidence.”  INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, shown in this 2012 file photo, might as well be waving goodbye to the graft charges in connection with the $329-million National Broadband Network deal with China’s ZTE Corp. after the Sandiganbayan granted her demurrer to evidence, giving credence to her argument that the prosecution failed to prove that the contract would be disadvantageous to government. INQUIRER PHOTO

Long vilified after stepping down from the presidency, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo now basks in legal vindication.

Completing a remarkable turnaround in her fortunes, the former President and now Pampanga representative was exonerated on graft charges in connection with the scuttled $329-million National Broadband Network deal with China’s ZTE Corp.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Sandiganbayan’s fourth division granted the separate demurrers to evidence filed by Arroyo, her husband Jose Miguel Arroyo and former Commission on Elections Chair Benjamin Abalos, who were also absolved of the charges on Friday.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Sandigan dismisses Arroyo’s NBN-ZTE case

A demurrer is a motion for dismissal midway through a trial after the prosecution rests its case.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a 31-page decision penned by Associate Justice Jose Hernandez, the court gave credence to Arroyo’s argument that the prosecution largely failed to prove that the NBN contract would be disadvantageous to government.

Article continues after this advertisement

It said the prosecution failed to prove that the three, along with a fourth accused, the late former Transportation Secretary Leandro Mendoza, conspired to have the contract awarded to the Chinese corporation as alleged by whistle-blowers Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada and Jose de Venecia Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This failure to specify the circumstances establishing conspiracy among the four accused is violative of their right to be informed of the accusations hurled against them,” according to the decision.

The court further noted that Arroyo eventually cancelled the contract in October 2007; “thus, legally … there was no more contract to refer to at the time of filing of this case.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Former President Arroyo has been vindicated anew,” the former President’s lawyer Laurence Arroyo said in a statement.

“She has always kept her faith in the judiciary and our courts have not failed to fearlessly render justice. Our courts have not allowed themselves to be swayed by public opinion or perception. They are bound by the evidence and the evidence alone,” he said.

Arroyo was charged with two violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and one violation of the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees for allegedly having unlawful interest in the NBN project.

She was accused of using the power of the presidency to push for the approval of the proposal submitted by ZTE Corp. though she later cancelled the contract after it generated controversy.

The 2007 NBN-ZTE project would have interconnected government offices nationwide through broadband technology.

Arroyo’s counsel said this was the third legal victory for the Pampanga lawmaker, who only three months ago was still languishing in hospital detention until the Supreme Court dismissed the plunder case against her involving the alleged misuse of Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) funds.

“This is the third time our courts have granted her demurrer to evidence. The first time was in the PCSO case. The second time, only last week, was in the civil case filed by UCCP (United Church of Christ in the Philippines. And now this,” the lawyer said.

The UCCP case was a P6 million damage suit filed in July 2011 by the group over the extrajudicial killings of three pastors and two members, and the abduction of another pastor between 2003 and 2006.

“We are thankful to the Sandiganbayan for granting our demurrers in the three ZTE cases. It’s a well-reasoned decision. I encourage the public to read it,” the lawyer said.

RELATED STORIES

Court allows Arroyo bid to discredit evidence in graft raps

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

What Went Before: The NBN-ZTE deal

TAGS: Broadband, Graft, ZTE Broadband

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.