Espino: Suspension is not graft penalty | Inquirer News

Espino: Suspension is not graft penalty

/ 05:04 AM September 11, 2016

Rep. Amado Espino Jr.

Rep. Amado Espino Jr.

LINGAYEN, Pangasinan—Rep. Amado Espino Jr. on Friday said his 90-day preventive suspension ordered by the Sandiganbayan is not a punishment but “a matter of legal procedure,” and insisted that the graft charges he faced over illegal black sand mining operations were based on fabricated evidence.

Espino was charged in connection with his alleged involvement in illegal black sand mining while he was Pangasinan governor.

Article continues after this advertisement

Seven others, who were charged with Espino, were former provincial administrator Rafael Baraan and housing official Alvin Bigay; Cynthia Camara and Lolita Bolayog of Alexandra Mining and Oil Ventures Inc.; and Michael Ramirez, Gina Alcazar and Avery Pujol of Xypher Builders Inc.

FEATURED STORIES

Espino pleaded not guilty when arraigned on July 1.

Citing the Sandiganbayan ruling, Espino said the issuance of a preventive suspension order against him was a ministerial duty of the court.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said his suspension was a preventive measure before final judgment would be made, and that he remained entitled to the constitutional presumption of innocence.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Fabricated’

Article continues after this advertisement

Espino described the graft complaint as a “fabricated, politically-motivated harassment case, aimed at influencing the results of the 2013 and 2016 elections.”

“To the great dismay of those who orchestrated the filing of this [case] … the people of Pangasinan … have consistently refused to be swayed by the dirty hand of politics,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Espino won by a landslide in his reelection bid in 2013. His son, Amado Espino III, also won in the 2016 gubernatorial race.

“Unfortunately for us, we continue to suffer the adverse consequences of this dirty game called politics. The administrative case against Rafael Baraan and Alvin Bigay is now in the Court of Appeals, while the criminal case against the three of us … are in the Sandiganbayan,” Espino said. Gabriel Cardinoza, Inquirer Northern Luzon

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.