China shuns Seoul security dialogue amid missile defense row | Inquirer News

China shuns Seoul security dialogue amid missile defense row

/ 01:37 PM September 08, 2016

defense missile THAAD US

In this Friday, July 15, 2016 file photo, members of the Korean Veterans Association salute during a rally to support a deployment of the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, in front of the Defense Ministry in Seoul, South Korea. Chinese anger at South Korea over its decision to deploy an US anti-missile defense system appears to be threatening everything from appearances by the stars of K-Pop to future cooperation on North Korea at the United Nations. The signs read “Support a deployment of the THAAD.” AP FILE PHOTO

BEIJING — China is shunning a security dialogue in Seoul amid an ongoing row over South Korea’s decision to deploy a powerful US missile defense system.

The official newspaper Global Times quoted an unidentified Defense Ministry spokesman as saying China was not sending a delegation to this week’s Seoul Defense Dialogue because of “reasons of work arrangement.” It offered no other details.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: China thwarts UN condemnation of North Korea missile launch

FEATURED STORIES

China opposes the deployment of the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, whose radars it says will allow the US military to peer deep into northeastern China. Seoul and Washington say the system is intended solely to defend against North Korea’s missile threat.

China elevated the issue on Monday, with President Xi Jinping expressing China’s opposition directly in a meeting with his South Korean counterpart Park Geun-hye.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: China, Defense, Missile, North Korea, Park Geun-Hye, South korea, THAAD, Xi Jinping

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.