JV Ejercito posts P30,000 bail at Sandigan | Inquirer News
‘POLITICALLY MOTIVATED’

JV Ejercito posts P30,000 bail at Sandigan

/ 12:58 AM April 08, 2016

FREE ON BAIL Sen. Joseph Victor Ejercito leaves the Sandiganbayan on Thursday after posting bail. RAFFY LERMA

FREE ON BAIL Sen. Joseph Victor Ejercito leaves the Sandiganbayan on Thursday after posting bail. RAFFY LERMA

Sen. Joseph Victor “JV” Ejercito on Thursday posted P30,000 bail at the Sandiganbayan, which on Monday ordered him arrested for using municipal calamity funds to buy high-powered firearms for the San Juan police when he was mayor of the city in 2008.

Ejercito arrived at the Sandiganbayan in Quezon City before 9 a.m., paid his bail in cash and was booked by the Fifth Division clerk of court.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Fifth Division issued a warrant for the arrest of the son of Manila Mayor Joseph Estrada on Monday after it found “sufficient grounds” to proceed with the graft and technical malversation charges brought by the Ombudsman.

FEATURED STORIES

After news of the arrest order spread on Wednesday, Ejercito issued a statement pleading his innocence and blaming his legal trouble on local politics in San Juan.

“I maintain my innocence and deny any wrongdoing in the purchase of high-powered firearms in 2008. I know I did nothing wrong, and that this case is undoubtedly politically motivated by oppositionists at the local scene,” Ejercito said, referring to former ally House Minority Leader Ronaldo Zamora and Zamora’s son, San Juan Vice Mayor Francis Zamora.

The younger Zamora is running against Ejercito’s mother, San Juan Mayor Guia Gomez, who is running for reelection in polls next month.

Coaccused

Francis Zamora is among 14 former and incumbent city officials charged with Ejercito.

Zamora also paid P6,000 bail along with former San Juan Vice Mayor Leonardo Celles and City Councilors Andoni Carballo, Vincent Pacheco, Angelino Mendoza, Dante Santiago, Rolando Bernardo, Grace Pardines, Domingo Sese, Francis Peralta, Edgardo Soriano, Jannah Ejercito-Surla, Ramon Nakpil and Joseph Christopher Torralba.

ADVERTISEMENT

The other accused in the case are city administrator Ranulfo Dacalos, treasurer Rosalinda Marasigan, lawyer Romualdo de los Santos, budget officer Lorenza Ching and engineer Danilo Mercado.

Conspiracy

“I trust that the court of law will conduct fair proceedings and exercise wise judgment,” said Ejercito, who was elected to the Senate in 2013 after serving one term in the House of Representatives.

Ejercito, who was mayor of San Juan from 2001 to 2010, claimed he was only thinking of “the protection and interests of the people of San Juan against lawless elements” when he approved the purchase of submachine guns for the city police in 2008.

The Ombudsman alleged that Ejercito conspired with other city officials to use the municipal government’s calamity funds to buy the firearms in February 2008.

Ejercito, according to the Ombudsman, tapped the city’s calamity fund to buy the firearms as “investment for disaster preparedness.”

The City Council passed a resolution authorizing the purchase of the firearms.

Purchased for P2.1 million were three Daewoo K2 submachine guns and 17 Daewoo K1 submachine guns.

Guns not for relief

The submachine guns are made by Daewoo Precision Industries of South Korea and chambered for the 5.56mm ammunition.

The Ombudsman found the use of calamity funds for the purchase of the submachine guns irregular, as firearms are not among the things considered necessary for disaster relief and mitigation under a circular jointly issued by the Department of Budget and Management, and the Department of the Interior and Local Government in 2003.

Ombudsman prosecutors pointed out that San Juan was not under a state of calamity at the time of the weapons purchase.

They also charged that the firearms were acquired without competitive public bidding.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The prosecutors noted that the postqualification documents covering the acquisition of the firearms were dated earlier than the publication of an invitation to bid, showing that “unwarranted benefit, advantage and preference were accorded to the supplier.”

TAGS: guns, Nation, News

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.