Coming soon: More than P450 million | Inquirer News
ON TARGET

Coming soon: More than P450 million

/ 04:13 AM March 31, 2016

From questioning by members of the Senate blue ribbon committee the other day, clearly Kim Wong had nothing to do with the biggest electronic bank heist in history.

Kim, a big-time junket operator, was implicated because he hosted people who took part in the $81-million laundered amount, and who paid him or entrusted to him part of the loot.

As he promised to me days before Tuesday’s hearing by the blue ribbon committee, Kim did not withhold any information to the Senate body.

Article continues after this advertisement

He was spontaneous and forthright in his answers to questions from senators.

FEATURED STORIES

Kim thought he was dealing with honest people and the money came from legitimate sources.

A junket operator hosts big-time gamblers, taking care of their needs like hotel accommodations, restaurants to dine in and places to go to, even lending them money when they run out of cash.

Article continues after this advertisement

That’s how P450 million, part of the loot, ended up in Kim’s hands.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a phone conversation I had with Kim yesterday morning, he said he was returning the P450 million to the Bangladesh government.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the amount came from Shuhua Gao, a junket operator from Beijing, who borrowed the money from him after losing heavily in the casino.

Kim told the blue ribbon committee on Tuesday he would return the stolen money when he was asked by Sen. Sonny Angara if he would do so after finding out the money paid to him was stolen.

Article continues after this advertisement

But it seems Kim will be returning much more than the P450 million he promised the Senate committee Tuesday.

Yesterday afternoon, I had a talk with his son Kevin who said  the family would also return $4.6 million at Solaire casino under Kim’s name for safekeeping.

Another amount is P40 million deposited with the Wong family-owned Eastern Hawaii Leisure Corp. which would have been gambled away by Kim’s Chinese guests at the Midas casino, Kevin said.

All told, Kim’s family will return P701,784,000 to the Bangladesh government.

The figure was taken by adding P450 million, P211,784,000 ($4.6 million converted to pesos at the current exchange rate of P46.04 to the US dollar) and P40 million.

Kevin told me his father decided to return the money after a family council meeting.

In that meeting, Kevin and his sister Kathryn told their father, “Pa, maski maghirap tayo dapat natin isauli ang pera na alam na nating ninakaw (Papa, even if we become poor we should return the money that we now know was stolen).”

*                                    *                             *

I said in this space Tuesday Kim Wong was an honest man and I was proven right.

I’ve known Kim since 1978 when he was just 16 years old.

At that time, he was an errand boy of Impierno, a girlie bar I frequented in Ermita, Manila, while I was a police reporter for Manila Bulletin.

The bar owner, Sofio Tiu, told me Wong was an honest employee who never told a lie.

Many years later, when Kim and I became partners in a restaurant business, I found that he had had retained honesty as a virtue.

That’s why I am repeating what I wrote in Tuesday’s column and in previous columns: Kim couldn’t have taken part in the biggest electronic robbery in history.

RELATED STORIES

A comedy of errors

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Back home and ready for hearing

TAGS: Kim Wong, Shuhua Gao

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.