Sandigan junks graft rap vs ex-GSIS chief Garcia | Inquirer News

Sandigan junks graft rap vs ex-GSIS chief Garcia

/ 05:14 PM March 22, 2016

sandiganbayan-0704

FILE PHOTO

The Sandiganbayan has dismissed the graft case of former Government Security Insurance System (GSIS) President Winston Garcia involving an allegedly anomalous eCard project with the Union Bank of the Philippines.

In a resolution promulgated last March 17, the anti-graft court’s Second Division said it has dismissed the case due to the Office of the Ombudsman’s inordinate delay in filing the case.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the graft charge filed by state prosecutors, Garcia in 2004 allegedly gave undue preference to Union Bank causing damages in government by awarding the GSIS eCard project to the said bank without complying with the requirements under the implementing rules and regulations of the Government Procurement Reform Law.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Ex-GSIS execs face graft charges over 2004 deal 

The GSIS eCard is an automated teller machine (ATM) card used to disburse funds to the members of the state pension fund, the court noted.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court approved the accused’s plea to dismiss the case due to the Ombudsman’ inordinate delay in filing the case which violated Garcia’s right to speedy trial.

Article continues after this advertisement

The anti-graft court said the complaint against Garcia was filed before the Ombudsman on April 1, 2005, however, the anti-corruption agency took 10 years to investigate the complaint before filing it before the Sandiganbayan on Sept. 2, 2015.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman investigators took six years or until Sept. 12, 2011 to docket the complaint as a regular case.

The Ombudsman had said the field investigation took six years due to a parallel congressional investigation in the House of Representatives.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said the Ombudsman’s Field Investigation Office “slumber(ed) through those six years” as if waiting for the results of the congressional investigation.

“By way of peroration, the Court rules that on the ground alone of violation of speedy disposition of the case, his case ought to be dismissed outright,” the court said.

The court also found no probable cause to try Garcia for graft over allegations that he violated the procurement law by unlawfully resorting to limited source bidding, or selective bidding, in favor of Union Bank.

The court found that the GSIS had invited its depository banks as well as private banks to be its partner for the eCard project—Union Bank, Land Bank of the Philippines, Philippine National Bank, Development Bank of the Philippines, Bank of Philippine Islands and Equitable PCI Bank.

The GSIS Technical Committee chose the Union Bank as the most advantageous to the GSIS according to the results of its financial and technical evaluation.

The court said none of the losing banks “raised a whimper” after the Union Bank was chosen.

The Commission on Audit also did not issue a notice of disallowance on the project.

“Any imputation of violation of Section 3(e) of the Republic Act 3019 in the procurement of Union Bank as ‘eCard partner’ of GSIS would be more speculative than real…” the court said.

Under Section 3 (e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, a public official, in the discharge of his or her official functions, is prohibited from inflicting any undue injury or giving unwarranted benefits, advantage or preference to any person or entity.

Also cleared of graft raps were some of Garcia’s co-accused: former GSIS officials executive vice president Enriqueta Disuanco, senior vice president Benjamin Vivas Jr., board of trustees chair Hermogenes Concepcion Jr., and members Elmer Bautista, Fulgencio Factoran, Floriño Ibañez, Aida Nocete, Reynaldo Palmiery, Ellenita Tumala-Martinez and Leonora Vasquez-de Jesus.

The court decision was penned by Associate Justice Teresita Diaz-Baldos and concurred by Associate Justices Napoleon Inoturan and Michael Frederick Musngi.

Ombudsman had accused the GSIS of awarding the project to Union Bank “despite the fact the closing date for submission of bid proposals has not been closed and prior to the recommendation of the committee tasked to evaluate the proposals.”

On its website, the GSIS described the eCard project as its “most innovative government-issued identification card today.”

“This is because the eCard Plus is not just a GSIS membership ID Card, it is also a GSIS transactional card, disbursement card, ATM Card, VISA debit card, hospitalization discount card, medicine discount card, and tuition discount card, among others,” the website read.

Garcia, who was appointed GSIS chief by former President and now Pampanga Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, is now the president of the local party One Cebu and is the gubernatorial bet in the upcoming May elections against reelectionist Hilario Davide III.

READ: Former GSIS chief Garcia files COC for Cebu governor

The dismissal of Garcia’s graft case was promulgated just days before One Cebu broke up its alliance with Vice President’s Jejomar Binay’s United Nationalist Alliance (UNA), accusing the latter of disloyalty. RAM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: Garcias’ One Cebu Party dumps Binay

TAGS: GSIS, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.