SC urged to take action on petition against K-12 program | Inquirer News

SC urged to take action on petition against K-12 program

/ 04:27 PM February 22, 2016

Teachers, students, parents and various organizations on Monday asked the Supreme Court to act on their almost one year old petition against the government’s “ambitious” K-12 program, a national 12-year basic education program.

In an urgent manifestation, Coalition of K-12 whose members include Council of Teachers and Staff of College and Universities of the Philippines (CoTeSCUP) told the high court that with the looming implementation of the program, some higher education institutions (HEI) have transferred their faculty members to senior high school without certainty if their wages will be reduced or not while other faculty members are in danger of losing their jobs.


Petitioners attached a Jan. 16, 2016 memo from Saint Louis University and a letter dated Aug. 28, 2015 from the University of Santo Tomas (UST). They indicated that there are school officials and employees that will be retrenched following the implementation of the K-12 program.

In UST, faculty members who wish to transfer from tertiary level to Senior High School need to undergo retooling seminars with a warning that failure to attend the seminar would mean forfeiture of any teaching slot in the Senior High School.


“These are contrary to the rights to security of tenure and academic freedom of HEI faculty members. These are also contrary to the principle of non-diminution of benefits in Article 100 of the Labor Code. These also violate the HEI faculty members’ rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining,” petitioners told the high court.

Petitioners pointed out retrenchment is only the last resort.

“Again, this violates the rights to security of tenure and to freedom of association and collective bargaining of the employees.”

In their original petition, the coalition already mentioned the possibility of loss of jobs, contractualization, forced retirement, and constructive dismissal.

Petitioners added that Republic Act 10533 or the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 or the law which gave birth to K-12 failed to give “full protection to labor and promotion of full employment and equality of employment opportunities” as stated under the Constitution.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Coalition of K-12, Council of Teachers and Staff of College and Universities of the Philippines, curriculum, Education, K to 12, K-12, K+12, Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.