Petitioner asks SC to conduct daily oral arguments on Poe DQ case | Inquirer News

Petitioner asks SC to conduct daily oral arguments on Poe DQ case

/ 04:04 PM February 01, 2016

Presidential bet Senator Grace Poe.  INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / RICHARD A. REYES

Presidential bet Senator Grace Poe. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO 

One of the petitioners in the disqualification case against Senator Grace Poe asked the Supreme Court to conduct a daily oral arguments on the case due to time constraints.

In a motion for continuous hearings, Atty. Estrella Elamparo said after oral arguments last January 19 and 26, only Poe was able to present her arguments before the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case is about the twin petitions filed by the senator against the Commission on Elections (Comelec) en banc canceling her certificate of candidacy for president.

FEATURED STORIES

Elamparo added Comelec as well as herself and the other petitioners including former Senator Francisco “Kit” Tatad, former UE Law Dean Amado Valdez and Law Professor Antonio Contreras have yet to present their arguments.

“Considering that at least six representatives from among the public and private respondents are slated to do their presentations, it is anticipated that it will take more than one hearing day to complete the oral arguments,” Elamparo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Furthermore, she said that the Comelec itself has already delayed the printing of ballots to February 8 to give way to the proceedings before the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Considering that time is of the essence and the importance of resolving this case soonest for the guidance of the electorate, petitioner most humbly requests that the oral arguments be set continuously on a daily basis, if possible, until completion,” Elamparo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court’s oral argument is set to resume its oral arguments next Tuesday with the Comelec presenting its arguments. RAM

RELATED STORIES

Article continues after this advertisement

2 SC justices raise tough questions during oral argument on Poe’s DQ

A statistical argument on Poe’s disqualification

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: case, Comelec, Commission on Elections, disqualification, petitioners

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.