SC affirms disqualification of 6 'nuisance' presidential bets, 4 partylist groups | Inquirer News

SC affirms disqualification of 6 ‘nuisance’ presidential bets, 4 partylist groups

By: - Reporter / @JeromeAningINQ
/ 08:45 PM January 13, 2016

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has affirmed the Commission on Elections’ disqualification of six “nuisance” presidential candidates as well as several party-list groups.

The court en banc, in its session held last January 21, dismissed the various petitions filed against Comelec by candidates Rizalito David, Elly Pamatong, Ephraim Defino, Antonio Obina, Luisito Falcon, Juanita Trocenio and Buenafe Briggs.

“The court uniformly, in minute resolutions, dismissed the petitions on the ground that the Comelec did not act with grave abuse of discretion,” the high court’s spokesperson, lawyer Theodore Te, said in a briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

Te said the court also dismissed the various petitions filed against Comelec by four disqualified party-list groups and regional political parties, namely, Mindanao Alliance for Reforms, Bagong Alyansang Manggagawang Pangtransportasyon para sa Edukasyon at Reporma, People’s Movement for Democratic Governance and Aasenso sa Barangay Inc.; and by Nid Anima, the vice presidential candidate of Aasenso Sabungero partylist.

FEATURED STORIES

Two party-list groups, Vieva Farmers Coalition and Scholarship ng Masa, were given time to argue before the court their petitions questioning their disqualification by Comelec.

The election body was given 10 days to reply to the petitions, Te said.  SFM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: affirmation, Commission on Elections, court ruling, disqualification, Election, Nation, News, Nid Anima, nuisance bets, Politics, Supreme Court, Theodore Te

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.